Save 75% - Only $49.99 for 1 full year! digitalPLUS subscription offer ends 12/1
NewsOpinionReaders Respond

Is the U.S. being drawn inexorably into a war with Iran?

ElectionsIranIsrael

The American people are apparently just spectators in the matter of whether or not we attack Iran ("Is re-election driving Obama's Israel policy?" March 6).

Our politicians bend over backward to assure Israel that we will support it in a war with Iran — a nation of 79 million people and almost four times the size of Iraq.

Is there an active discussion in the news media over the probable costs in human life and to the U.S. economy that war with Iran would entail? Very little.

Is there open debate in the House and the Senate on a formal declaration of war with Iran? Of course not.

Is there any move toward some kind of national referendum on whether or not America can afford yet another war in the Middle East at this time? Forget it.

I guess we're supposed to be good citizens, sit back and watch what happens. But can we call this democracy?

Jay Hilgartner, Baltimore

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
ElectionsIranIsrael
  • U.S. negotiations with Iran are a dangerous farce
    U.S. negotiations with Iran are a dangerous farce

    Having missed a July deadline for reaching an agreement with Iran over its nuclear program, the six world powers party to the talks -- the United States, Russia, China, France, United Kingdom and Germany -- have set November 24 as...

  • Keep talking with Iran
    Keep talking with Iran

    The announcement today that the U.S. and Iran have agreed to extend talks over Tehran's disputed nuclear program is far short of what we might have hoped for. But the extension can't be counted as a failure either. If the goal is to keep up the pressure on Iran's leaders to reach a deal,...

  • Cardin must drop support for more Iran sanctions [Letter]
    Cardin must drop support for more Iran sanctions [Letter]

    Thank you for your support for continuing negotiations in your July 17th "Keep talking with Iran" editorial. U.S. and Iranian negotiators agreed to continue the talks through late November due to the progress they have made already toward peacefully resolving the standoff over Iran's nuclear...

  • Obama foolish to write Khamenei
    Obama foolish to write Khamenei

    To make matters regarding the negotiations with Iran over its nuclear and missile program even worse than what was described by Cal Thomas ("U.S. negotiations with Iran are a dangerous farce," Nov. 8), it is now known that President Barack Obama chose to contact Ayatollah Khamenei during that...

  • Keep talking with Iran [Editorial]
    Keep talking with Iran [Editorial]

    Our view: With nuclear talks likely to be extended, it's crucial that Congress continue to give the administration room to negotiate

  • U.S. should end Iran sanctions [Letter]
    U.S. should end Iran sanctions [Letter]

    The recent commentary, "An enemy revisited" (July 13), correctly states that in witnessing the harsh realities "the United States would do well to reassess its view on Iran." In fact, we should have a dialogue and trade with Iran, a country that does not threaten U.S. national interests. The...

  • Syria and Iran are U.S. foreign policy disasters [Letter]
    Syria and Iran are U.S. foreign policy disasters [Letter]

    While reading the summary of key 2013 events, when I got to the description that "Syria blinked," I had to blink myself. I assume the writer meant "Syria winked." At least that's about as much attention as Bashar al-Assad paid to President Barack Obama's red lines — or maybe they were...

  • The world's nuclear gang-bangers have the upper hand
    The world's nuclear gang-bangers have the upper hand

    Proliferation of atomic weapons looks likely -- and massively destabilizing

Comments
Loading