Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Iran is serious about nuclear talks; it's the U.S. that has stymied progress on the issue

The report onIran'srefusal to negotiate about its nuclear program is misleading ("Iran defiant in response to EU's boycott of its oil," Jan. 24). Iran's "unwillingness to negotiate" is belied by the fact that Iran negotiated with the U.S. long before the implementation of sanctions ostensibly designed to force it back to the bargaining table.

In the first and only American attempt to negotiate with Iran on this issue, the U.S. accepted an agreement between Iran and third-party countries that would have allowed Iran to transfer 1,200 kilograms of low- enriched uranium in exchange for fuel rods enriched to 20 percent for the production of medical isotopes. But the Obama administration walked away from this agreement when Iran wanted a guarantee that it would receive the fuel rods.

The U.S. is the party unwilling to negotiate in good faith without preconditions. Iran under the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty has a right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes, and its willingness to concede that right in negotiations with the U.S. demonstrated a seriousness that the U.S. lacks.

John G. Bailey, Edgemere

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Iran deal a 'Pandora's Box'

    Iran deal a 'Pandora's Box'

    If we believe that Iran will cease its nuclear program and its support for international terrorism after the agreement is signed, we are living in a fool's paradise ("Sen. Ben Cardin says U.S. negotiators got 'awful lot' in Iran deal," July 23). The argument that Iran will no longer develop nuclear...

  • Wishful thinking about the U.S. deal with Iran

    Wishful thinking about the U.S. deal with Iran

    Regarding Ray McGovern's commentary "Is the 'military option' on Iran off the table?" (July 20), much as we'd like to believe this is a good deal for the U.S., the facts suggest otherwise.

  • Iran deal won't lead to a safer world

    Iran deal won't lead to a safer world

    In 1938, the prime ministers of the United Kingdom and France signed a agreement called the Munich Pact with Adolph Hitler. This act effectively sealed the fate of portions of Czechoslovakia.

  • Don't trust Iran deal

    Don't trust Iran deal

    In response to KAL's cartoon of July 19 depicting Republican hawks not trusting a peace dove brought by President Barack Obama under the guise of the Iran Nuke Deal, I have a two word response: Neville Chamberlain.

  • Is the 'military option' on Iran off the table?

    Is the 'military option' on Iran off the table?

    If, as seems likely, President Barack Obama retains enough support to complete the nuclear deal with Iran, it will be largely because enough members of the House and Senate are persuaded by his argument that the only other real option is war.

  • Dubious benefits of Iran deal

    Dubious benefits of Iran deal

    Words matter. Because of this, I tend not to blindly accept what others say (especially those with political ambitions) but choose to verify and often do so by reading source documents. This week, there has been much travail with regards to a deal with the Islamic Republic of Iran, its nuclear...