Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Sun wrong on involuntary commitment bill

The Sun's April 5 editorial ("The tricky question of involuntary commitment") misses two critical points about the bill to clarify mental health civil commitment standards in Maryland, and it misstates another.

The bill's key component — making explicit that a person whose mental illness prevents him from meeting his basic survival needs of food, clothing and shelter is "dangerous to self" within the meaning of the law — goes unmentioned. It is hard to imagine a reasonable argument why such an individual would not need hospital care. And yet many who cannot function independently go untreated under the current Maryland law, simply because they do not appear violent or suicidal.

The editorial also fails to note that the language of the bill is identical in substance to the civil commitment laws of most other states. Maryland is being asked to catch up to the pack, not to venture into uncharted waters. If the bill really "risks creating more problems than it solves," wouldn't the opponents have horror stories to report from these other states? We have heard none.

Finally, the claim that the bill "would broaden the definition of dangerousness to cases in which … a person might become dangerous [but] doesn't exhibit serious symptoms at the time he is evaluated" conflates the very different questions of dangerousness and mental illness. The bill would certainly not permit the commitment of anyone who does not demonstrate severe mental illness and a need for treatment. But it would make clear that an actively delusional or psychotic person with a history of dangerous behavior should not be released on the grounds that he made no threats against anyone during his evaluation.

The Sun grants far too much deference to the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene's predictable resistance to change. That is the nature of bureaucracies, even well-intentioned ones. If the House of Delegates is guided instead by the merits of the arguments put forth, it will follow the Senate's unanimous lead and give Marylanders with untreated severe mental illness a chance to recover the lives they have lost.

Brian Stettin, Arlington, Va.

The writer is policy director of the Treatment Advocacy Center.

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • Why no talk of Gray's disabilities?
      Why no talk of Gray's disabilities?

      According to what I've read, Freddie Gray was exposed to lead in early childhood. This resulted in neurological damage, developmental impacts and learning disabilities. Yet, I have seen no discussion of how disability issues factored into the tragic events surrounding Freddie Gray's death ("Six...

    • Baltimore's fateful choice
      Baltimore's fateful choice

      The police need to make a calculated decision on how to proceed regarding the unrest in Baltimore, given there are risks associated with whatever path they take ("After charges against officers, Hopkins' students call for continued protests, dialogue on Freddie Gray," May 1).

    • Violence is not the answer
      Violence is not the answer

      I wanted to write to voice my opinion on the events that led to the death of Freddie Gray along with the protests that turned violent in Baltimore. In police custody, Gray incurred a spinal injury that later resulted in his death. Watching the news coverage of the videos, it is not clear who is...

    • Mayor failed to acknowledge mistakes
      Mayor failed to acknowledge mistakes

      As a consequence of the recent Baltimore protests and riots, there has been a lot of discussion about the leadership qualities of Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake ("Who's in charge?" April 28). There is a fatal flaw in this debate. People are equating the quality of her leadership with decision-making....

    • City's leaders are too inexperienced
      City's leaders are too inexperienced

      I am a little taken aback by what is going on in Baltimore City the last few days. I see the problem as lack of leadership. Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake has no experience to deal with a situation of this magnitude ("Who's in charge?" April 28). The mayor wants to run the whole show, and she doesn't...

    • Young people are our future
      Young people are our future

      Regardless of our political affiliation it is difficult under the best of circumstances to raise children. We all want our children to become full functioning, well-educated citizens being productive for our families and society.

    Comments
    Loading

    63°