Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Health insurance and doctor availability [Letter]

The statistics reported in the article, "Doctor appointment availability varies by insurance type" (April 7), were alarming and deserve reflection and pause by your readers and all Baltimoreans. The findings highlight a challenging issue for our health care system as more people enroll in insurance plans, both private and Medicaid, thanks to the Affordable Care Act. But this isn't a new issue and goes to the core of our societal notions of fairness.

The fact that there was such a wide gap between the ability of someone with private insurance to get an appointment with a new primary care doctor versus those with Medicaid (85 percent versus 58 percent) raises a red flag — both in terms of the numbers themselves and the potential assumption that high-quality doctors are often not giving appointments to Medicaid patients. At the same time, the idea that 85 percent is considered success at all is concerning. What good is commercial insurance if you can only find a doctor 85 percent of the time?

Unfortunately, in traditional fee-for-service medicine, doctors are often forced into the businessman's dilemma of trying to optimize the payment for their time by limiting appointments given to patients with lower paying insurance (Medicaid programs) and increasing the proportion of their time spent seeing patients with higher paying insurance plans.

We all deserve an approach that removes this type of misaligned incentive from care delivery and allows physicians to remain focused on patients and practicing medicine, not the burden of reimbursement.

We encourage everyone in the process of choosing a health plan, whether private insurance or a government-sponsored plan, to research whether or not physicians have "open panels," meaning they are accepting new patients. A truly open panel accepts all new patients irrespective of whether their insurance plan is provided by their employer, the government, or self-paid. What's more, getting an appointment is just half the battle. The other half is getting care when you need it. Ask if those open panel physicians provide same-day appointments and how long it takes to see a specialist. Ask if they are embracing the way people live today: Do they let you book an appointment by phone or online, do they email or offer video appointments? We believe it is about time the entire medical community begins to reduce barriers for people to receive high-quality care.

There may be many ways to address the challenges the article calls out. At Kaiser Permanente, we take great pride in our more than 1,000 high quality Mid-Atlantic physicians who focus on care. Every person deserves equal access to high quality care. It's simply the right thing to do.

Kim Horn and Dr. Bernadette Loftus, Rockville

The writers are, respectively, president of Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic States and associate executive director of The Permanente Medical Group.

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Health exchange still a hassle
    Health exchange still a hassle

    I found The Sun's editorial, "Beyond the website" (Nov. 23), about how well the new-and-improved Maryland Health Connection had launched to be ironic and not in a good way. Perhaps you should have looked beyond the health insurance website itself to see if the system really had been improved...

  • Why don't Dems question Md.'s flawed health exchange rollout?
    Why don't Dems question Md.'s flawed health exchange rollout?

    Who are Gov. Martin O'Malley and Attorney General Doug Gansler trying to kid? The reason potential litigation over the flawed rollout of Maryland's health exchange is being postponed is the upcoming election. They are deeply afraid of what Noridian is going to claim about Lt. Gov. Anthony...

  • Sun's stupidity is showing
    Sun's stupidity is showing

    You have published several articles recently in support of Obamacare but have chosen to ignore the news of how this hoax was enacted through deception, fraud, misrepresentation of material facts and outright lies ("Who are you calling stupid?" Nov. 14)!

  • Obamacare: Beyond the website
    Obamacare: Beyond the website

    While it's too early to declare the new Maryland health insurance exchange website a complete success, its largely smooth launch this week offers the prospect that this open enrollment period will be focused less on the technology and more on ensuring Marylanders are getting access to high...

  • Getting help with health exchange
    Getting help with health exchange

    We couldn't agree more with the importance of consumers getting in-person assistance when they purchase health insurance ("Obamacare: Beyond the website," Nov. 21). That's why the Maryland Women's Coalition for Health Care Reform named Maryland's connector entities with their navigators and...

  • Health site has political overtones
    Health site has political overtones

    The Maryland Health Connection website is certainly much improved from its original debut, but why has it been politicized ("With Obamacare, health insurance leads to better health," Nov. 18)? The prominent heading on the exchange is "Change is here" echoing President Barack Obama's campaign...

Comments
Loading