Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Health insurance and doctor availability [Letter]

The statistics reported in the article, "Doctor appointment availability varies by insurance type" (April 7), were alarming and deserve reflection and pause by your readers and all Baltimoreans. The findings highlight a challenging issue for our health care system as more people enroll in insurance plans, both private and Medicaid, thanks to the Affordable Care Act. But this isn't a new issue and goes to the core of our societal notions of fairness.

The fact that there was such a wide gap between the ability of someone with private insurance to get an appointment with a new primary care doctor versus those with Medicaid (85 percent versus 58 percent) raises a red flag — both in terms of the numbers themselves and the potential assumption that high-quality doctors are often not giving appointments to Medicaid patients. At the same time, the idea that 85 percent is considered success at all is concerning. What good is commercial insurance if you can only find a doctor 85 percent of the time?

Unfortunately, in traditional fee-for-service medicine, doctors are often forced into the businessman's dilemma of trying to optimize the payment for their time by limiting appointments given to patients with lower paying insurance (Medicaid programs) and increasing the proportion of their time spent seeing patients with higher paying insurance plans.

We all deserve an approach that removes this type of misaligned incentive from care delivery and allows physicians to remain focused on patients and practicing medicine, not the burden of reimbursement.

We encourage everyone in the process of choosing a health plan, whether private insurance or a government-sponsored plan, to research whether or not physicians have "open panels," meaning they are accepting new patients. A truly open panel accepts all new patients irrespective of whether their insurance plan is provided by their employer, the government, or self-paid. What's more, getting an appointment is just half the battle. The other half is getting care when you need it. Ask if those open panel physicians provide same-day appointments and how long it takes to see a specialist. Ask if they are embracing the way people live today: Do they let you book an appointment by phone or online, do they email or offer video appointments? We believe it is about time the entire medical community begins to reduce barriers for people to receive high-quality care.

There may be many ways to address the challenges the article calls out. At Kaiser Permanente, we take great pride in our more than 1,000 high quality Mid-Atlantic physicians who focus on care. Every person deserves equal access to high quality care. It's simply the right thing to do.

Kim Horn and Dr. Bernadette Loftus, Rockville

The writers are, respectively, president of Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic States and associate executive director of The Permanente Medical Group.

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • An incomplete report on payments to doctors from drug companies [Letter]

    It actually doesn't do much good to head up an article about payments to doctors by telling readers that a doctor invented a great new device and the company sent him a check for royalties ("Payments to doctors from drug companies, device makers revealed," Oct. 4).

  • Health exchange still a hassle

    Health exchange still a hassle

    I found The Sun's editorial, "Beyond the website" (Nov. 23), about how well the new-and-improved Maryland Health Connection had launched to be ironic and not in a good way. Perhaps you should have looked beyond the health insurance website itself to see if the system really had been improved from...

  • Gruber and his liberal lies

    Gruber and his liberal lies

    Nice coverage of the Jonathan Gruber hearing which amounted to, I think, about 60 words ("Obamacare adviser sorry for comments," Dec. 10). He appeared to spend most of the time denying, lying and obfuscating — true traits of liberals these days.

  • Md. lawmakers can help those with chronic conditions

    Md. lawmakers can help those with chronic conditions

    On behalf of Marylanders with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PI), the Immune Deficiency Foundation (IDF) applauds the MedChi CEO Gene Ransom for standing up to insurance companies looking to take advantage of our state's Health Benefits Exchange patients ("The high cost of health care reform,"...

  • Why has The Sun neglected the Jonathan Gruber scandal?

    Why has The Sun neglected the Jonathan Gruber scandal?

    Your systematic neglect of the horrendous Jonathan Gruber/Obamacare scandal is undoubtedly attributable to your partisan bias ("Gruber flap reopens not-so-old wounds," Dec. 1).

  • Unaffordable care in Bel Air

    Unaffordable care in Bel Air

    I am 59 years old, have been a practicing family physician for 30 years and I can't wait to pay my new health care premium for 2015. This past year, I paid $680 a month for my wife and me with a $5,400 deductible. With the Affordable Care Act, in 2015, I will be paying $700 a month with a $12,000...

  • CareFirst's surprise birthday gift

    CareFirst's surprise birthday gift

    I got an unexpected present after turning 70 in December — a 35 percent premium increase on my Medigap insurance from CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield.

  • Obamacare's big day

    Obamacare's big day

    It received surprisingly little fanfare, but last week three states demonstrated how to "fix" the Affordable Care Act, should the Supreme Court rule adversely against a key provision within it. Arkansas, Pennsylvania and Delaware all received permission to set up state health insurance exchanges...

Comments
Loading

84°