Summer Sale! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Incinerator pollution is well documented

I am responding to the recent letter by William F. Brandes ("O'Malley right on waste incinerators," Oct. 24) concerning The Sun's editorial on incinerators and the Environmental Integrity Project report on waste-to-energy (WTE) incinerators ("Clean power or dirty air?" Oct. 17).

Mr. Brandes complains that our report on the environmental and energy impacts of waste-to-energy incinerators rests on biased data. The renewable energy portfolio is supposed to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and the pollution they create. Thus, it seems fair to compare emissions from WTE plants to those from coal boilers they will replace.

Our report compares emissions per hour of energy from Maryland's WTE incinerators and four largest coal power plants that represent nearly 90 percent of the coal-fired generation in Maryland. Our report actually understates differences in emissions rates because it does not include data for 2010, when coal plants had to cut emissions much further to meet the state's Healthy Air Act deadlines. WTE incinerators emit more nitrogen oxides, lead and mercury for the amount of energy generated than do Maryland's coal plants, and when including the 2010 data, the gap in emissions rates only increases. The 2010 data is on our website.

WTE plants have been reclassified as a "top tier" renewable, equivalent to solar and wind technologies that do not generate any air pollution at all. With due respect to Mr. Brandes, we do not think Maryland has made a "balanced" decision by promoting a technology that pollutes more per hour than coal power and which offers fewer jobs and less economic benefits than recycling and source reduction. Mr. Brandes suggests that we defer to the state because it must "weigh" competing interests. But the Maryland legislature is not Plato's Republic and neither are federal or state bureaucracies. Most decisions are a messy hybrid of political and policy considerations, as Mr. Brandes should know after 30 years at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Rather than respond to our data, Mr. Brandes dismisses it as the work of "special interest advocates." Mr. Brandes has done paid consulting for the WTE industry he promotes, according to an earlier letter in the Sun. That should not disqualify his opinions, which deserve a respectful hearing. But we ask that he extend the same courtesy to those who disagree and rely on facts rather than insinuations about motive.

Eric Schaeffer, Takoma Park

The writer is executive director of the Environmental Integrity Project.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • O'Malley should trash the waste-to-energy bill

    O'Malley should trash the waste-to-energy bill

    Our view: The pros and cons of incineration are complicated, but environmental activists are right to ask governor to veto incineration as a Tier 1 renewable resource

  • Waste-to-energy is backed by science

    I am writing to you today because recently The Sun has published letters urging Governor O'Malley to veto the bill approved by the Maryland General Assembly according Tier 1 status to waste-to-energy (WTE) facilities. The Earth Engineering Center of Columbia University ( has been...

  • Burning trash means jobs, energy for Maryland

    Much to my dismay and disappointment, I have been informed that Gov. Martin O'Malley is hesitant to sign legislation reclassifying waste-to-energy incinerators as a preferred form of renewable energy in Maryland.

  • Environmental groups wrong on waste-to-energy plants

    Having spent a substantial portion of my career in the solid waste management field, I have followed with interest the debate regarding waste-to-energy facilities as renewable energy sources. I find it disconcerting that some environmental groups continue trying to aggressively discredit WTE incineration...

  • Maryland now a leader in waste-to-energy

    I want to thank Gov. Martin O'Malley for making the right decision and signing legislation that will put waste-to-energy on par with landfill gas in Maryland's renewable portfolio standard. This critical measure finally ends a policy that pushes garbage to mega-landfills. This new policy will help...

  • Energy Answers incinerator project would put the health of thousands of Baltimore residents at risk

    Columnist Jay Hancock's effort to take another journalistic swipe at BGE and Constellation Energy leaves the impression that the Energy Answers incinerator planned for Baltimore City is a benign, renewable energy project worth Marylanders' support ("This waste-to-energy plant could be a model for...