Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Don't confuse America's history of legal immigration with today's illegal immigrants

It never ceases to amaze me how commentators such as Thomas F. Schaller purposely mix up the issue of today's illegal immigrants with the history of legal immigration ("Hostility toward recent immigrants a long U.S. tradition," July 11).

Yes, there was anti-immigrant bias in our past, but the country has since learned that legal immigration is one of the engines that help drive the economy so that everyone has a chance to benefit from American capitalism.

The people objecting to the current immigration policy are not against immigrants, as Mr. Schaller suggests when he asks "why is there so much consternation about the latest, Latino-dominated generation of American immigrants?"

The consternation is over illegal Latino immigrants, who have crossed our borders and ignored our immigration laws, used our schools to educate their children, stressed our medical facilities and taken advantage of our social services.

I see no resolution to the conflict until the Latino community itself begins to support immigration policies that actively discourage illegal immigration.

Ron Wirsing, Havre de Grace

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Ignorance on immigration

    Ignorance on immigration

    Republicans have written to your newspaper claiming that President Barack Obama, former Gov. Martin O'Malley and other Democratic elected officials are trying to "give voting rights to millions of undocumented immigrants who came here illegally and don't belong in this country in the first place"...

  • Immigration takes center stage

    Immigration takes center stage

    In calling for an immigration policy that includes a path to citizenship and expanded legal protections against deportation for millions of undocumented immigrants living in the U.S., Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Rodham Clinton has presented her potential Republican rivals in 2016 with...

  • No amnesty for undocumented immigrants

    No amnesty for undocumented immigrants

    President Obama wants to write his own laws on immigration and amnesty ("Immigrants, advocates must wait for deportation relief," Feb. 17).

  • Who do the Democrats think they're fooling?

    Who do the Democrats think they're fooling?

    I am disappointed but not surprised by the furor over whether to fully fund the Department of Homeland Security ("Congress OKs deal to avoid shutdown at Homeland Security," Feb. 27).

  • Executive orders are a bipartisan pastime

    Executive orders are a bipartisan pastime

    House Speaker John Boehner has made it clear that he intends to block the Obama administration's executive order shielding millions of undocumented immigrants from the threat of immediate deportation ("Congress scrambles to avoid Homeland Security shutdown," Feb. 26).

  • Democrats side with foreigners

    Democrats side with foreigners

    Democrats are telling Republicans to put the American people first and pass a clean Department of Homeland Security funding bill because Democratic senators will not accept anything other than a clean bill ("Congress OKs deal to avoid shutdown at Homeland Security," Feb. 27). Republicans say they...

  • Don't send $1B to Central America

    Don't send $1B to Central America

    The Obama administration has a plan to pour $1 billion of U.S. taxpayer money into Central America "to try to slow the flow of unaccompanied minors and other migrants without documentation" to the U.S. ("Democrats press Kerry on $1B Latin aid request," Feb. 25). Just wondering, wouldn't $1 billion...

  • GOP must stick to its guns on immigration, Homeland Security budget

    GOP must stick to its guns on immigration, Homeland Security budget

    Some thoughts on your editorial regarding the U.S. Department of Homeland Security budget while basking in climate cooling ("No time to make America less safe," Feb. 16). First, why is it OK for the Democrats to filibuster and not pay a price when the GOP would be blasted for the same technique?

Comments
Loading

68°