Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Howard Co.'s ban on smoking in parks won't end there

The Sun's argument that an outdoor smoking ban is not the government as nanny is circular and wrong-headed ("Smoking ban: A Howard County nanny state? Hardly," July 12). On one hand The Sun allows that there is little if any possibility of secondhand smoke health problems for nonsmokers in outdoor parks. In the next breath The Sun suggests that it still is in the government's best interest to not even tacitly condone an individual's poor choice. The reasoning here is that government knows best, or what is commonly referred to as government as nanny, despite what The Sun says. The challenge is that while this time the law is "contained" to only parks, regulations rarely stop at low easy rung of the ladder. Once the government gets a foothold, it climbs.

The second argument The Sun makes also falls short. Without the ban, there is no impediment to a non-smoker's rights by those smoking in the outdoors. If it is about air quality, the list of similar infractions is exponential. For example, diesel busses should be banned for the choking fumes they emit every day. With this ban, the government is absolutely "telling people what to do or saying it knows best how they should live their lives." The government does not want to even tacitly condone the behavior that is by all accounts confined only to the individual engaged in the activity. Excepting the litter of spent cigarettes, there are few if any complaints regarding outdoor smoking. It is not too far fetched to see a future where a person enjoying (yes some people enjoy smoking) tobacco in his or her yard will be prevented from doing so because a neighbor can smell it.

This law is the type of foothold that allows future expanded laws. When smoking ceases to be the "single biggest preventable cause of disease and death," where will the government turn its attention? Certain foods? Alcohol? Medications? After all, such attention is for an individual's own good as he or she may be deemed (as smoker's are) to have no ability to decide what is good for them. Tobacco is demonized and impossible to argue for, except in the framework of individual choices one may make.

The government regulating individual choices is exactly what government as nanny is all about. No one will pay mind to impositions on "smoker's rights," but the ground work is laid for similar legislation to control other individual behavior, whatever the subject.

Bill Burnham, Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Howard to ban smoking in county parks

    Howard to ban smoking in county parks

    First such prohibition in the state

  • Poll of the day: Howard County ban on smoking in parks

    Poll of the day: Howard County ban on smoking in parks

    And please be sure to take our poll of the day: Do you think it's right for Howard County to ban smoking in public parks?

  • Clean air with taxes, not regulations

    Clean air with taxes, not regulations

    Though the recent Supreme Court ruling against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's power plant emissions regulations was disappointing, I was happy to see The Sun emphasize the example our state has set by implementing strict anti-pollution laws in the article, "Justices rule against EPA...

  • Schools need resources, not reform

    Schools need resources, not reform

    There are so many assumptions embedded within Donald Manekin's recent commentary that I find problematic that I'm not sure where to even begin ("Reinventing Baltimore's schools," June 29).

  • Invest in buses, not Red Line

    Invest in buses, not Red Line

    Now that Baltimore's leaders are seeking a way to revive the Red Line, I want to know where the $288 million allocated for that project went ("City leaders seek a way to revive Red Line plan," June 30). Before these folk approach Gov. Larry Hogan, a full accounting is in order. The taxpayers of...

  • City doesn't need light rail

    City doesn't need light rail

    Inevitable construction surprises and cost overruns, upkeep of elevators, escalators, tunnels, electrical systems, the streetcars themselves and salaries for more transit police would all be ongoing costs for a proposed Red Line ("City leaders seek a way to revive Red Line plan," June 30). Baltimore...

Comments
Loading

75°