Get unlimited digital access to baltimoresun.com. $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Hopkins strike is a PR disaster for Baltimore's biggest employer [Letter]

Having read Johns Hopkins Hospital President Ronald R. Peterson's recent commentary, it's easy to see why the institution is having problems striking a labor bargain with lower-level employees ("Balancing priorities and resources at Johns Hopkins," April 11).

Hopkins has always acted as if the employees should be grateful to work at a world-renowned hospital with world-class health leaders. Mr. Peterson clearly lacks sensitivity to such issues, but this insensitivity has been institutionalized over several generations.

The benefits cited by Mr Peterson are available to all full-time employees. The issue at hand is money. If Hopkins keeps its employees in poverty, it is unlikely that their children will work hard to prepare themselves for advanced studies.

Employees at Hopkins need to provide food and shelter for their families. Hopkins has a terrible reputation in this area. If the hospital's current administrators cannot develop a plan that improves the condition of employees they should be replaced by leaders who are capable of devising business models that don't rely on plantation economics and the exploitation of workers.

Hopkins administrators are failing in their responsibilities not only to their employees but to the citizens of Baltimore. One of the most absurd aspects of this debate is that Hopkins is trying to portray itself as an institution that can't afford to pay a decent salary to all its employees. Clearly it needs to improve its image as a major employer in the region.

I don't believe that the Hopkins public relations staff are succeeding in their defense of the institution because few people are buying what they are selling.

Edward McCarey McDonnell, Baltimore

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • How do Hopkins Hospital workers' wages stack up? [Letter]
    How do Hopkins Hospital workers' wages stack up? [Letter]

    Why hasn't there been an article yet comparing pay in the different Baltimore hospitals to see how the Johns Hopkins Hospital pay compares to the rest ("Hopkins workers strike over wages, working conditions," April 9)?

  • Hopkins has the money to pay a living wage [Letter]
    Hopkins has the money to pay a living wage [Letter]

    According to its mission statement, Johns Hopkins Hospital seeks "to afford solace and enhance the surrounding community." This goal is hardly consistent with the poverty-level wages paid by that fine institution to its core employees ("Balancing priorities and resources at Johns Hopkins,"...

  • If Hopkins can afford to pay its CEO so much, it can afford living wages [Letter]
    If Hopkins can afford to pay its CEO so much, it can afford living wages [Letter]

    Johns Hopkins Hospital President Ronald R. Peterson, defends his decision to restrain raises for Hopkins employees by citing the hospital's "finite pool of funds." ("Balancing priorities and resources at Johns Hopkins," April 11.)

  • Don't send $1B to Central America
    Don't send $1B to Central America

    The Obama administration has a plan to pour $1 billion of U.S. taxpayer money into Central America "to try to slow the flow of unaccompanied minors and other migrants without documentation" to the U.S. ("Democrats press Kerry on $1B Latin aid request," Feb. 25). Just wondering, wouldn't $1...

  • Md. needs more clean energy
    Md. needs more clean energy

    Maryland currently ranks fifth in the nation for worst air quality and produces over 60 percent of its energy from dirty sources like coal and natural gas. Immediately after his inauguration, Gov. Larry Hogan rolled back coal regulations that would have greatly improved air quality conditions...

  • Keystone veto was in U.S. interest
    Keystone veto was in U.S. interest

    The purpose of the Keystone XL pipeline is to make it easier for Canada to export some of filthiest crude oil on the planet — not to the U.S. (we don't need it) but to other countries.

Comments
Loading