Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

The benefits of Baltimore's school renovation and repair program must be shared equitably

A recent column written in part by the president of the Johns Hopkins University urged lawmakers to back a massive school renovation and repair program in Baltimore City ("New schools, new city," March 20). But given past history, it's fair to ask whether the kind of public-private partnerships cited in the commentary will truly benefit the most needy residents of the East Baltimore communities adjacent to this powerful institution.

The schools in East Baltimore lead the city in low educational performance. In 20 years, will the proposal for a public-private partnership to create a new school run by the Johns Hopkins University benefit local residents, or will it only benefit the growing community of Johns Hopkins employees there?

We would like to see how these partnerships have and will benefit the communities surrounding the institution because the data paint a disturbing picture.

Where are the 8,000 promised permanent jobs in this redevelopment project? What mechanisms are in place to prevent the original residents from being priced out of this new community? How has the displacement of former and remaining Middle East residents affected their health? Whose children will be allowed to attend the new school?

Those negotiating for public dollars have disregarded the community and evaded these questions for far too long. It is time for answers and for actions that bring equitable benefits to all of East Baltimore's residents.

Donald Gresham, Marisela Gomez, Lawrence Brown, Baltimore

The writers are affiliated with the Community Housing and Relocation Working Group in East Baltimore.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • No dancing on Red Line's grave

    No dancing on Red Line's grave

    Spare us the dancing on the grave of the Red Line by those who have no right to call it a boondoggle ("Red Line was a boondoggle," June 30). We'll never know if it was or not since it won't be built in my lifetime. Certainly, I can't foresee any of Baltimore's myriad social problems improving without...

  • Ban smokeless tobacco from baseball

    Ban smokeless tobacco from baseball

    It is time for Major League Baseball to take a stand and ban smokeless tobacco, period. It is a foul, disgusting and dangerous addiction. It's never talked about until you hear of a player or former player who is diagnosed with mouth cancer or a player such as Tony Gwynn dies from the disease (...

  • EPA mercury ruling was even-handed

    EPA mercury ruling was even-handed

    The Sun's article on mercury limits incorrectly asserts that the U.S. Supreme Court split on ideological grounds ("Justices rule against EPA power plant mercury limits," June 29). On the contrary, the Supreme Court split was one between original intent, honest interpretations of the Constitution...

  • Reimer was The Sun's best

    Reimer was The Sun's best

    Congratulations to Susan Reimer on her retirement. I will definitely miss her column. It was the only thing worth reading in what they call The Sun ("Susan Reimer signs off," June 25).

  • Clean air with taxes, not regulations

    Clean air with taxes, not regulations

    Though the recent Supreme Court ruling against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's power plant emissions regulations was disappointing, I was happy to see The Sun emphasize the example our state has set by implementing strict anti-pollution laws in the article, "Justices rule against EPA...

  • Schools need resources, not reform

    Schools need resources, not reform

    There are so many assumptions embedded within Donald Manekin's recent commentary that I find problematic that I'm not sure where to even begin ("Reinventing Baltimore's schools," June 29).