Save 75% - Only $49.99 for 1 full year! digitalPLUS subscription offer ends 12/1
NewsOpinionReaders Respond

City's misguided approach to Camp 83

Stephanie Rawlings-Blake

Baltimore City may be five years into its Ten Year Plan to End Homelessness (aka "The Journey Home"), but the tragically prejudicial comments from city representatives regarding the individuals experiencing homelessness who were residing at "Camp 83" set back decades both the city's progress on the persistent issue of homelessness and their credibility on understanding homelessness ("City clears homeless camp; protesters push for permanent solution," March 8).

To insinuate that individuals at Camp 83 aren't staying at emergency shelters because they "can't bring booze into the shelter" is offensive and destructively misguided and fails to take into account that most individuals do not stay at emergency shelters because they do not feel safe, because their belongings have great potential to be stolen, because they have been traumatized by the behaviors of staff and other clients, and because they are unable to wait in line for hours during the day to be granted a bed in the shelter — particularly the working poor who lack housing and are at their jobs in the afternoon.

Perhaps even worse is the notion that razing the encampment is needed "to push the homeless there to get their lives back on track." Homelessness is primarily caused by deliberate social and economic policy decisions made over the past 30 years that have increased the number of people living in or near poverty, decreased the supply of affordable housing, and undermined people's ability to meet life's basic necessities. Scattering the residents at Camp 83 to other alleyways, corners and abandoned buildings in Baltimore will not "get their lives back on track."

If Baltimore wants to take constructive and meaningful action to address homelessness — particularly in light of the commitment inherent in its Ten Year Plan to End Homelessness — it must invest in permanent, affordable housing. Employment as well as engagement in medical, mental health and addiction treatment are all possible — and increasingly effective — after someone has secured stable housing. Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake stated that temporarily providing motel placements while permanent housing is identified and secured would "not be a responsible use of taxpayer money" while simultaneously — and ironically — providing $1 million to bail out the failing Hilton Hotel. The combination of these two stories would be more appropriately found in the pages of The Onion than The Sun.

If Baltimore has the financial wherewithal to meet the needs of a struggling luxury hotel for the city's most affluent visitors, surely it can find the decency and compassion to meet the needs of some of its most vulnerable residents. The city should utilize effective solutions to address the needs of vulnerable Baltimoreans instead of flagrantly relying on dated stereotypes to disband homeless encampment communities that currently have nowhere else to go and ultimately undermining efforts to end homelessness in Baltimore.

Lisa Klingenmaier, Baltimore

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    Stephanie Rawlings-Blake
    • Homeless deserve better
      Homeless deserve better

      The editorial, "No journey home" (Nov. 11), was a welcome response to the insensitivity in City Hall. Taking away people's belongings, whether clothes, papers or hard-won bits of furniture on a pretext of cleaning the area they live in, is cruel and contemptuous. Nobody deserves to be treated...

    • Focusing on the root causes of homelessness [Letter]
      Focusing on the root causes of homelessness [Letter]

      Your recent article on the city's homeless people cries out for clarification ("Addressing the intractable problem of homelessness in Baltimore," Dec. 2).

    • No journey home
      No journey home

      The encampments that have sprouted periodically around the lower end of the Jones Falls Expressway have always represented a small portion of the Baltimore's homeless population, but they have gotten a lot of attention from city officials. A succession of mayors have repeatedly attempted to...

    • Homelessness is anything but "intractable" [Letter]
      Homelessness is anything but "intractable" [Letter]

      Thanks to The Sun for drawing attention to the crisis of homelessness in our community ("Addressing the intractable problem of homelessness in Baltimore," Dec. 2). Clearly we face daunting challenges and limited resources to meet the needs of our most vulnerable neighbors. But the plight of...

    • Homeless deserve greater attention and opportunities [Letter]
      Homeless deserve greater attention and opportunities [Letter]

      I was quite impressed to read the front-page coverage given to the dispossessed ("City's homeless line up, even as count is down," Dec. 2). And I appreciate the work of Catholic Charities.

    • Why can't the richest state end homelessness? [Letter]
      Why can't the richest state end homelessness? [Letter]

      It was a bit sad to read about Baltimore City's homeless on the front page ("City's homeless line up, even as count is down" (Dec. 2) and then right underneath a story about Columbia spending more than $5 million to create a new park ("Columbia park plan has a butterfly theme"). Why with all...

    • The solution to suburban homelessness
      The solution to suburban homelessness

      Kudos to The Sun for its editorial on the explosion of poverty and homelessness in the Baltimore suburbs ("Homeless in suburbia," Oct. 13). Certainly, as the editorial suggests, the social safety net needs to be strengthened to help all families and individuals struggling with homelessness, and...

    • Homeless in suburbia
      Homeless in suburbia

      Our view: As Baltimore's suburbs have grown in population, they've also become more economically diverse; homelessness is now as big a problem there as in the city