Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Don't force helmets on bike riders

In the article by Scott Dance ("Helmet bill gets objections from bike advocates," Feb. 13), a supporter of the helmet bill, Nancy Floreen, is quoted as saying, "We have a moral obligation to help people in this regard." So, even if help is neither requested nor desired, the government must force it's "help" upon us. I'm reminded of what Ronald Reagan said: The most frightening words in the English language are, "We're the government. We're here to help." While I think that it's foolish to ride a bicycle or a motorcycle without a helmet or to drive without a seat belt, a law to protect us from ourselves is going too far.

Riding a bicycle in traffic would be far less dangerous if the riders would simply obey traffic laws, like stop signs, traffic lights and direction of travel.

Clay Seeley, Owings Mills

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Bike helmets: Put a lid on it

    Bike helmets: Put a lid on it

    Why is there any debate about requiring a simple step that will save lives and prevent injuries?

  • Bike safety requires more than helmets

    Bike safety requires more than helmets

    Although I always wear a helmet when bicycling, the feel-good bill to mandate adult bike helmets has flaws ("Helmet bill gets objections from bike advocates," Feb. 13). First, the bill would adversely impact the poor, minorities, and immigrants who don't own a car and depend upon their bicycle...

  • Bike helmets have their benefits

    Bike helmets have their benefits

    Letter writer Kevin Strickler says that requiring bicyclists to wear helmets will lead to fewer bikers ("Helmet laws will reduce number of bikers," Feb. 19). I say that not wearing helmets will reduce the number of bikers in a most unpleasant way — by more deaths on the road.

  • Bike helmets should be optional

    Bike helmets should be optional

    Having ridden bicycles since childhood, I prefer not to wear a bicycle helmet ("The bike helmet debate," Feb. 16. However, I would not want to discourage a rider who feels more secure in wearing one.

  • Motorcyclists share bicyclists' helmet concerns

    Motorcyclists share bicyclists' helmet concerns

    As a motorcyclist, I am always fascinated by the concerns of bicyclists as to helmets ("Helmet bills gets objections from bike advocates," Feb. 13). If you switched the mode of transportation, you would see the same arguments apply. Yet motorcyclists are not allowed the same opportunity afforded...

  • Helmet laws will reduce number of bikers

    Helmet laws will reduce number of bikers

    Baltimore has made a great deal of progress in making itself more bike friendly ("Cycling advocates fight proposed helmet law, preferring 'safety in numbers'" Feb 13). As a homeowner in Baltimore City, I enjoy the convenience of jumping on my bike to make short trips to run errands rather than...

  • Helmet-less cyclists come up lame

    Helmet-less cyclists come up lame

    I am a cyclist who has done big miles for a long span of years. I am also one who was hit from behind by a car in 2005, an accident which both projected me 85 feet into the air and required more than a year of recovery. I was lucky to survive and would not have, save for the helmet I was wearing....

  • Cycling advocates fight proposed helmet law, preferring 'safety in numbers'

    Cycling advocates fight proposed helmet law, preferring 'safety in numbers'

    State lawmakers considering requirement for all to wear protective headgear while biking

Comments
Loading

82°