Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. $12 for 12 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Bike helmets seem pretty reasonable

I was surprised there is opposition to requiring all bike riders wear helmets ("Helmet bill gets objections from bike advocates," Feb. 13). In my 2,500-pound car I must wear a seat belt and am surrounded by airbags. It is because people may be involved in accidents (by definition an unplanned event) that these auto safety measures are required.

Paved streets are designed to move autos, trucks and buses. Traffic signals left turn lanes, and barriers help keep traffic safe and facilitate its flow. Crosswalks are to protect people when they cross streets built for cars. Sidewalks are for pedestrians. If bikers want use public streets, governments that build and maintain these thoroughfares have every right to require adherence to basic safety requirements, which include riding in lanes set aside for them and using headgear. Data demonstrating that helmets reduce head injuries are extensive and convincing, and Johns Hopkins University student Nathan Krasnopoler's death does not change those facts.

Of course, drivers should be aware of anyone and anything in public roads. But to say that more bikers should be in the streets so that drivers will learn to think more about them and not to resent them is a dangerous and wrongheaded idea. Moreover, if wearing a helmet would discourage someone from riding a bike, they probably were not that interested.

Sometimes the obvious has to be stated: Riding a bicycle on thoroughfares designed and used by motor vehicles will always be dangerous, and helmets will lessen injuries caused by inevitable accidents. Even though they were published, I still have trouble believing serious adults made the comments these anti-helmet people did in the Sun article.

Jerry Levin, Baltimore

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • Bike helmets: Put a lid on it
      Bike helmets: Put a lid on it

      Why is there any debate about requiring a simple step that will save lives and prevent injuries?

    • Bike safety requires more than helmets
      Bike safety requires more than helmets

      Although I always wear a helmet when bicycling, the feel-good bill to mandate adult bike helmets has flaws ("Helmet bill gets objections from bike advocates," Feb. 13). First, the bill would adversely impact the poor, minorities, and immigrants who don't own a car and depend upon their...

    • Bike helmets have their benefits
      Bike helmets have their benefits

      Letter writer Kevin Strickler says that requiring bicyclists to wear helmets will lead to fewer bikers ("Helmet laws will reduce number of bikers," Feb. 19). I say that not wearing helmets will reduce the number of bikers in a most unpleasant way — by more deaths on the road.

    • Bike helmets should be optional
      Bike helmets should be optional

      Having ridden bicycles since childhood, I prefer not to wear a bicycle helmet ("The bike helmet debate," Feb. 16. However, I would not want to discourage a rider who feels more secure in wearing one.

    • Motorcyclists share bicyclists' helmet concerns
      Motorcyclists share bicyclists' helmet concerns

      As a motorcyclist, I am always fascinated by the concerns of bicyclists as to helmets ("Helmet bills gets objections from bike advocates," Feb. 13). If you switched the mode of transportation, you would see the same arguments apply. Yet motorcyclists are not allowed the same opportunity...

    • Helmet laws will reduce number of bikers
      Helmet laws will reduce number of bikers

      Baltimore has made a great deal of progress in making itself more bike friendly ("Cycling advocates fight proposed helmet law, preferring 'safety in numbers'" Feb 13). As a homeowner in Baltimore City, I enjoy the convenience of jumping on my bike to make short trips to run errands rather...

    • Helmet-less cyclists come up lame
      Helmet-less cyclists come up lame

      I am a cyclist who has done big miles for a long span of years. I am also one who was hit from behind by a car in 2005, an accident which both projected me 85 feet into the air and required more than a year of recovery. I was lucky to survive and would not have, save for the helmet I was...

    • Cycling advocates fight proposed helmet law, preferring 'safety in numbers'
      Cycling advocates fight proposed helmet law, preferring 'safety in numbers'

      State lawmakers considering requirement for all to wear protective headgear while biking

    Comments
    Loading