Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Take insurance out of health equation

The op-ed by Drs. Joshua M. Sharfstein and Laura Herrera and Charles Milligan ("Caring about costs, too," Sept. 27) offers a compelling set of recommendations to improve the quality of health care while reducing costs. Unfortunately, they neglected to describe the best single evidence-based practice — eliminating private health insurance.

Private health insurance adds only costs, but no value, to the delivery of health services. A Cambridge Medical Care Foundation study found that 31 percent of health care spending in the U.S. — equal to more than $600 billion annually — pays for administration, marketing, and the profits of private insurance. In 2007, the Congressional Research Service reported that the U.S. spends seven times as much per person on administrative and insurance costs as do OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries, and with far worse health outcomes here.

Vermont is implementing a health care system that will save money while covering everyone in the state with the same high quality health insurance. As the Vermont Strategic Plan notes, "Interacting with insurers costs an estimated $83,000 per year per physician in the U.S. — four times as much as in Canada" — without four times better health care. By the way, the Vermont model includes global budgeting for all hospitals — another important evidence-based practice mentioned by Dr. Sharfstein and his colleagues.

We will only solve our health care cost problem by directing our health care dollars toward actual health care. Let's look to the north for a truly effective solution.

Jeff Singer, Baltimore

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Health exchange still a hassle
    Health exchange still a hassle

    I found The Sun's editorial, "Beyond the website" (Nov. 23), about how well the new-and-improved Maryland Health Connection had launched to be ironic and not in a good way. Perhaps you should have looked beyond the health insurance website itself to see if the system really had been improved...

  • Why don't Dems question Md.'s flawed health exchange rollout?
    Why don't Dems question Md.'s flawed health exchange rollout?

    Who are Gov. Martin O'Malley and Attorney General Doug Gansler trying to kid? The reason potential litigation over the flawed rollout of Maryland's health exchange is being postponed is the upcoming election. They are deeply afraid of what Noridian is going to claim about Lt. Gov. Anthony...

  • Sun's stupidity is showing
    Sun's stupidity is showing

    You have published several articles recently in support of Obamacare but have chosen to ignore the news of how this hoax was enacted through deception, fraud, misrepresentation of material facts and outright lies ("Who are you calling stupid?" Nov. 14)!

  • Obamacare: Beyond the website
    Obamacare: Beyond the website

    While it's too early to declare the new Maryland health insurance exchange website a complete success, its largely smooth launch this week offers the prospect that this open enrollment period will be focused less on the technology and more on ensuring Marylanders are getting access to high...

  • Getting help with health exchange
    Getting help with health exchange

    We couldn't agree more with the importance of consumers getting in-person assistance when they purchase health insurance ("Obamacare: Beyond the website," Nov. 21). That's why the Maryland Women's Coalition for Health Care Reform named Maryland's connector entities with their navigators and...

  • Health site has political overtones
    Health site has political overtones

    The Maryland Health Connection website is certainly much improved from its original debut, but why has it been politicized ("With Obamacare, health insurance leads to better health," Nov. 18)? The prominent heading on the exchange is "Change is here" echoing President Barack Obama's campaign...

Comments
Loading