Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99
News Opinion Readers Respond

Take insurance out of health equation

The op-ed by Drs. Joshua M. Sharfstein and Laura Herrera and Charles Milligan ("Caring about costs, too," Sept. 27) offers a compelling set of recommendations to improve the quality of health care while reducing costs. Unfortunately, they neglected to describe the best single evidence-based practice — eliminating private health insurance.

Private health insurance adds only costs, but no value, to the delivery of health services. A Cambridge Medical Care Foundation study found that 31 percent of health care spending in the U.S. — equal to more than $600 billion annually — pays for administration, marketing, and the profits of private insurance. In 2007, the Congressional Research Service reported that the U.S. spends seven times as much per person on administrative and insurance costs as do OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries, and with far worse health outcomes here.

Vermont is implementing a health care system that will save money while covering everyone in the state with the same high quality health insurance. As the Vermont Strategic Plan notes, "Interacting with insurers costs an estimated $83,000 per year per physician in the U.S. — four times as much as in Canada" — without four times better health care. By the way, the Vermont model includes global budgeting for all hospitals — another important evidence-based practice mentioned by Dr. Sharfstein and his colleagues.

We will only solve our health care cost problem by directing our health care dollars toward actual health care. Let's look to the north for a truly effective solution.

Jeff Singer, Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • GOP Congress won't do much
    GOP Congress won't do much

    So now the Republicans have control of the Congress ("Republicans seize control of U.S. Senate," Nov. 5). Yeah! How much do Americans think is going to get done now? The next two years will be spent trying repeal the Affordable Care Act.

  • Health site has political overtones
    Health site has political overtones

    The Maryland Health Connection website is certainly much improved from its original debut, but why has it been politicized ("With Obamacare, health insurance leads to better health," Nov. 18)? The prominent heading on the exchange is "Change is here" echoing President Barack Obama's campaign...

  • Sun's stupidity is showing
    Sun's stupidity is showing

    You have published several articles recently in support of Obamacare but have chosen to ignore the news of how this hoax was enacted through deception, fraud, misrepresentation of material facts and outright lies ("Who are you calling stupid?" Nov. 14)!

  • Why is The Sun ignoring Gruber?
    Why is The Sun ignoring Gruber?

    This past week several videos have surfaced showing one of the architects of Obamacare saying it only passed because the American people are stupid and were lied to ("Who are you calling stupid?" Nov. 14). According to Jonathan Gruber, our elected officials lied to us about keeping our...

  • Dems' clout dims
    Dems' clout dims

    Sens. Barbara Mikulski and Benjamin Cardin should realize it's not about the bacon; they were elected to protect the residents of Maryland from federal overreach.

  • Health exchange officials must work to improve the quality of care
    Health exchange officials must work to improve the quality of care

    The National Alliance on Mental Illness applauds the Easter Seals' recent article encouraging lawmakers to improve health insurance plan benefits for millions of Americans ("Getting what you pay for in the ACA," Nov. 15).

Comments
Loading