Save 75% - Only $49.99 for 1 full year! digitalPLUS subscription offer ends 12/1
NewsOpinionReaders Respond

Harbor Point merits city's support

Sharon Green MiddletonBill HenryCarl Stokes

"Council members Carl Stokes, Sharon Green Middleton and Bill Henry voted against the deal," writes The Sun in its article reporting the City Council's decision to help finance the upscale Harbor Point development ("Harbor Point bonds gets OK," Aug. 13). "This is probably the worst piece of legislation I've ever seen," Councilman Stokes is quoted as saying.

Wow! What a profound and futuristic comment from one of our Baltimore leaders. Better to let this land remain vacant and fallow then to use taxpayers' money to improve it. This sounds like a campaigner and not as a forward-thinking member of the city council.

Seven thousand jobs equals 7,000 salaries and God knows how many thousands of purchases. The workers need work clothes, transportation and lunch.

What were Mr. Stokes and associates thinking? Not about the future, that's for sure!

John Holter, Baltimore

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
Sharon Green MiddletonBill HenryCarl Stokes
  • The strength of downtown [Editorial]
    The strength of downtown [Editorial]

    Our view: T. Rowe Price's decision to stay in its Pratt Street headquarters is a reminder of the central business district's vibrancy

  • Harbor Point does not need more studies [Letter]
    Harbor Point does not need more studies [Letter]

    The recent commentary, "Harbor Point environmental questions," (Dec. 2), may lead The Sun's readers to believe that additional studies are necessary before work can begin on the proposed redevelopment there. In fact, these suggested studies have nothing to with the proposed redevelopment, which...

  • Red Line poses health threat, too [Letter]
    Red Line poses health threat, too [Letter]

    The recent commentary concerning Harbor Point and the hexavalent chromium clearly describes the potential harm to the surrounding residents, but there is another issue that should be of a greater concern ("Harbor Point environmental questions," Dec. 2).

  • Make Exelon building a real landmark
    Make Exelon building a real landmark

    The Baltimore City Urban Design and Architectural Review Panel should agree to the request to redesign the Exelon Corporation building at Harbor Point made by the developer ("Developer proposes to convert some Exelon office space to apartments," Sept. 27) upon one condition — that they...

  • Harbor Point and the city's low expectations
    Harbor Point and the city's low expectations

    The principles articulated by Michael Fox and Rachel Kutler ("Harbor Point and 'fair development,'" Sept. 13) are refreshing and thought-provoking. Why do we citizens not demand more accountability from developers?

  • Health hazards at former Allied Chemical site
    Health hazards at former Allied Chemical site

    I can't believe developer Marco Greenberg's quote in reference to the former Allied Chemical site and the potential hazards of building on top of capped chromium that "it's actually safer to build here than virtually anywhere else in the city" ("Harbor Point project stirs environmental...

  • Harbor Point: Stick to the facts
    Harbor Point: Stick to the facts

    Dan Rodricks' column ("Following the big money to Harbor Point," Aug. 18) on the development at Harbor Point contributes very little to the ongoing debate about the best ways of developing Baltimore. Indeed, Mr. Rodricks lapses into needless and unhelpful insults when he makes sophomoric...

  • No more Harbor Point surprises
    No more Harbor Point surprises

    Our view: News that developer Michael Beatty intends to buy the first round of Harbor Point bonds is a modestly pleasant surprise but a reminder of the lack of transparency in this deal

Comments
Loading