Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
NewsOpinionReaders Respond

No handouts for Exelon, Harbor Point

Exelon Corp.Baltimore Gas and Electric Co.

Kudos to Carl Councilman Stokes ("Stokes holds up Harbor Point," June 21). I hope the rest of the Baltimore City Council lines up behind him.

Harbor Point should not be developed with a new Exelon Corp. building, let alone one subsidized by taxpayer money.

Exelon has a fine building downtown. Why should ratepayers — we Baltimore Gas and Electric customers who have our rates increased continually — finance a tonier building blocks away from the current one?

Also, rising sea levels will seriously threaten Harbor East, Fells Point, downtown, and other low-lying areas in the coming years. Will Exelon move again at taxpayer cost?

Our city badly needs jobs, but not on projects for which we pay triply, through taxes, utilities and environmental costs.

Liz Simon-Higgs, Baltimore

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
Exelon Corp.Baltimore Gas and Electric Co.
  • Red Line poses health threat, too [Letter]
    Red Line poses health threat, too [Letter]

    The recent commentary concerning Harbor Point and the hexavalent chromium clearly describes the potential harm to the surrounding residents, but there is another issue that should be of a greater concern ("Harbor Point environmental questions," Dec. 2).

  • Make Exelon building a real landmark
    Make Exelon building a real landmark

    The Baltimore City Urban Design and Architectural Review Panel should agree to the request to redesign the Exelon Corporation building at Harbor Point made by the developer ("Developer proposes to convert some Exelon office space to apartments," Sept. 27) upon one condition —...

  • Harbor Point and the city's low expectations
    Harbor Point and the city's low expectations

    The principles articulated by Michael Fox and Rachel Kutler ("Harbor Point and 'fair development,'" Sept. 13) are refreshing and thought-provoking. Why do we citizens not demand more accountability from developers?

  • Health hazards at former Allied Chemical site
    Health hazards at former Allied Chemical site

    I can't believe developer Marco Greenberg's quote in reference to the former Allied Chemical site and the potential hazards of building on top of capped chromium that "it's actually safer to build here than virtually anywhere else in the city" ("Harbor Point...

  • Harbor Point: Stick to the facts
    Harbor Point: Stick to the facts

    Dan Rodricks' column ("Following the big money to Harbor Point," Aug. 18) on the development at Harbor Point contributes very little to the ongoing debate about the best ways of developing Baltimore. Indeed, Mr. Rodricks lapses into needless and unhelpful insults when he makes...

  • No more Harbor Point surprises
    No more Harbor Point surprises

    Our view: News that developer Michael Beatty intends to buy the first round of Harbor Point bonds is a modestly pleasant surprise but a reminder of the lack of transparency in this deal

Comments
Loading