Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Sun shoots blanks in coverage of gun hearing

Reporters Erin Cox and Michael Dresser should be ashamed regarding the manner in which they recorded the recent hearing on gun legislation in Annapolis ("Gun control draws more than 2,000 to Annapolis," March 2). The article does not represent the truth. Hundreds came out to support the governor's bill while over 1,000 came out against it. The "1,300" number they cite was the number of Marylanders who signed up to testify against the bill. They failed to mention another number in the article — 32 — which is how many people signed up to testify for the governor's bill. Just let that sink in — 1,300-plus against and 32 for. If there are, indeed, 85 percent of Marylanders in support of this bill, where were they? Not there, not anywhere.

There's another newsworthy item — the testimony lasted until 3:45 a.m. Saturday morning. I realize the reporters had to publish Friday night, but why not write a follow-up on what really happened?

While I know they can't put this in a news report, I just hope that they both read this legislation and see it for what it really is — a facade of action. These measures don't do anything to address the violence happening every day on our streets. These measures hurt law-abiding Marylanders. People like my mother who raised my brother and me alone would no longer have been able to afford the fees this bill creates ($350 or more). Plus, she better be a pretty good shot if she's going to have any luck defending herself against an intruder with only 10 rounds. When adrenaline is running and things are scary, it's hard to hit your target. If this bill becomes law, it will be a sad day for our state — a day in which the right to defend oneself became even more difficult for the weakest and most vulnerable of our law abiding citizens.

You know what would make an excellent story — how many repeat offenders just in Baltimore commit crimes with firearms and are let go. You'll find that of the 195 murders in the city last year, 70 percent were committed by convicted felons and 40 percent were felons convicted of previous gun crimes.

Do you know what Gov. Martin O'Malley's gun control legislation does to address this? Nothing. Nada. Zip.

If the governor and our lawmakers really wanted to make a difference in gun violence, they would focus their efforts on eliminating plea bargaining and make individuals who commit crimes with firearms serve minimum sentences. I really encourage you to look up these statistics and make it known just how many repeat violent criminals get let off again and again and again, even when they pull illegal guns on Baltimore cops (that's in reference to one of the testimonies from a Baltimore policeman). Real gun control is controlling these criminals from committing more crimes.

Locking these people up rather than letting them go, that's a step in the right direction toward a safer Maryland. Saying that I, a 30-something female, can only have 10 rounds to protect myself? That's a step toward making me a victim.

Please do us right and write the truth.

Kelley Mesa, Laurel

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • License gun purchases

    License gun purchases

    Thanks to Rep. Donna Edwards for her eloquent op-ed on the need to do more to prevent gun violence ("Dealing with guns demands more than another moment of silence," July 7).

  • NRA selectively interprets 2nd Amendment

    NRA selectively interprets 2nd Amendment

    As sure as nine people have been butchered by yet another gun-wielding maniac, there will be an outcry for more laws controlling the sale and registration of firearms, and the NRA will again claim they are heroically upholding the Second Amendment rights of every American citizen by opposing such...

  • Do concealed guns reduce crime? Let's find out

    Do concealed guns reduce crime? Let's find out

    Despite expert opinions, statistics and moral condemnations, the debate on gun control continues. Until the law permits everyone who wants to carry a concealed weapon to do so legally, there is insufficient data to decide for or against ("How to reduce gun violence," June 12).

  • How to reduce gun violence

    How to reduce gun violence

    At a time when Baltimore could desperately use some good news when it comes to the prospects of reducing violence, research from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health suggests we may already have taken a key step toward preventing gun homicides — it just may take a few years for us...

  • NRA's paranoia is catching

    NRA's paranoia is catching

    The Sun's editorial reflecting on the National Rifle Association convention in Nashville is an important statement on how the NRA has devalued our lives and our society ("Guns and the 'permanent darkness,'" April 16).

  • Guns and the 'permanent darkness'

    Guns and the 'permanent darkness'

    By overwhelming margins, polls show Americans support universal background checks for those seeking to purchase a firearm to help keep guns out of the hands of criminals and those who are dangerously mentally ill. Clearly, the last thing you want is for some paranoid personality, ranting and raving...

  • Fix the background check

    Fix the background check

    As inspiring and overdue as America's reassessment of the Confederate battle flag has been since last month's Charleston shootings, those who wish to truly honor the victims need to set their sights to an even higher purpose. Late last week, FBI director James Comey acknowledged that alleged shooter...

  • What gun rights and marriage equality (should) have in common

    What gun rights and marriage equality (should) have in common

    In the article, "A unique Maryland marriage sits at center of Supreme Court case considering gay nuptials" (March 13), Carrie Evans, executive director of Equality Maryland, is quoted as saying the following:

Comments
Loading

73°