Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Panicked gun buying and the NRA

I understand that there are about 310 million people living in the United States, and private citizens here own about 300 million firearms. If these figures are even roughly correct, then the gun industry faces the challenge of selling into a saturated market. They clearly have a motive for promoting repeat and multiple sales while repressing any regulations that would slow down the process or discourage the buyer.

In November of 2012, a barbaric mass human sacrifice was performed in Newtown, Conn.

We were predictably appalled by this, and our representatives in state and federal legislatures rushed to enact new regulations aimed at forestalling further tragedies of this kind. Right on cue, the gun industry's client apologists in the National Rifle Association jumped in to defend the ideal of an unregulated gun trade, ostensibly to arm a "well-regulated militia," whatever they imagine that to mean. They have employed scary rhetoric about the big, bad government's intention to shut down the market. Meanwhile, several thousand more Americans have died of gunshot wounds while Washington has been too intimidated by the NRA to even pass a modest requirement for background checks.

To nobody's surprise, the gun industry has since proudly posted and unprecedented surge in sales. Recently, National Public Radio reported that a shortage of ammunition for some models has triggered price-gouging and scalping on the Internet, all in service to the glut of panic buyers.

While the gun industry can well gloat, "mission accomplished," I say, "Rest in peace, children."

Thad Paulhamus, Baltimore

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Maryland's gun law is working
    Maryland's gun law is working

    The gun lobby's lawsuit against Maryland's life-saving Firearm Safety Act described in Saturday's front page article does not challenge the constitutionality of the key provision of the act — requiring handgun purchasers to first obtain a fingerprint based background check and license...

  • Md. gun law is working [Letter]
    Md. gun law is working [Letter]

    Jack Mccauley's letter belittling the Firearms Safety Act fails to mention the most important parts of the new law — the requirement that handgun purchasers get a fingerprint-based license and the authority for the state police to regulate firearms dealers ("O'Malley, Brown are kidding...

  • Gun law doesn't make Marylanders safer [Letter]
    Gun law doesn't make Marylanders safer [Letter]

    Lt. Gov. Anthony Brown's recent commentary on Maryland's 2013 Firearms Safety Act is disingenuous and deceitful ("Brown: I will enforce gun safety law," Oct. 2).

  • A wasteful death by Uzi [Letter]

    Though I seriously doubt it, I wonder if a gun advocate or a member of National Rifle Association could explain to me why a 9-year-old girl needs weapons training ("An Uzi, a 9-year-old and American exceptionalism," Aug. 31). When I first read about the 9-year-old girl who had accidentally...

  • The city's problem isn't guns, it's gangs [Letter]
    The city's problem isn't guns, it's gangs [Letter]

    While I agree with letter writer Pat Ranney that Baltimore has a serious gun violence problem, she is incorrectly placing blame on an inanimate object. Guns don't pull the trigger, people do ("Baltimore's violence won't end until we stand up to the gun lobby," Aug. 14).

  • Judge's decision on Md. assault weapons ban makes no one safer [Letter]
    Judge's decision on Md. assault weapons ban makes no one safer [Letter]

    U.S. District Judge Catherine Blake's decision upholding Maryland's assault weapons ban isn't a victory for anyone ("A victory for public safety," Aug. 14).

Comments
Loading