Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Background checks should be no-brainer

A background check for anyone wanting to buy a gun is something the vast majority of people in this country agree makes common sense ("We deserve a vote," Feb. 17). If licensed gun dealers must do it, obviously it makes no sense to exempt those 40 percent of gun purchases that evade the checks by going through private sellers. Case closed.

I'm sure every serious person also wants to see gun violence in this country decline. So universal background checks should be an easy vote for every member of Congress, no matter what state they represent.

Personally, I also strongly favor a ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. The gun lobby always tries to pick these ideas apart with technical objections but I take a broader view. If we're to begin changing the way Americans use and misuse guns, we have to begin to change the emotional climate — just as we have with smoking. Remember the days when cigarette companies proudly advertised on radio which veterans hospitals they had sent free smokes to each week? That sounds bizarre now — just as bizarre as the old TV smoking commercials on "The Flintstones" cartoons.

That's what we have to do with guns — not eliminate them, as that would be impossible — but make it socially unacceptable to think of using a gun to settle an argument or to express some self-perceived grievance.

Larry Carson, Columbia

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • Maryland's gun law is working
      Maryland's gun law is working

      The gun lobby's lawsuit against Maryland's life-saving Firearm Safety Act described in Saturday's front page article does not challenge the constitutionality of the key provision of the act — requiring handgun purchasers to first obtain a fingerprint based background check and license...

    • Md. gun law is working [Letter]
      Md. gun law is working [Letter]

      Jack Mccauley's letter belittling the Firearms Safety Act fails to mention the most important parts of the new law — the requirement that handgun purchasers get a fingerprint-based license and the authority for the state police to regulate firearms dealers ("O'Malley, Brown are kidding...

    • Gun law doesn't make Marylanders safer [Letter]
      Gun law doesn't make Marylanders safer [Letter]

      Lt. Gov. Anthony Brown's recent commentary on Maryland's 2013 Firearms Safety Act is disingenuous and deceitful ("Brown: I will enforce gun safety law," Oct. 2).

    • A wasteful death by Uzi [Letter]

      Though I seriously doubt it, I wonder if a gun advocate or a member of National Rifle Association could explain to me why a 9-year-old girl needs weapons training ("An Uzi, a 9-year-old and American exceptionalism," Aug. 31). When I first read about the 9-year-old girl who had accidentally...

    • The city's problem isn't guns, it's gangs [Letter]
      The city's problem isn't guns, it's gangs [Letter]

      While I agree with letter writer Pat Ranney that Baltimore has a serious gun violence problem, she is incorrectly placing blame on an inanimate object. Guns don't pull the trigger, people do ("Baltimore's violence won't end until we stand up to the gun lobby," Aug. 14).

    • Judge's decision on Md. assault weapons ban makes no one safer [Letter]
      Judge's decision on Md. assault weapons ban makes no one safer [Letter]

      U.S. District Judge Catherine Blake's decision upholding Maryland's assault weapons ban isn't a victory for anyone ("A victory for public safety," Aug. 14).

    Comments
    Loading