Save 75% - Only $49.99 for 1 full year! digitalPLUS subscription offer ends 12/1
NewsOpinionReaders Respond

Do the right thing on gun control

Personal Weapon ControlInterior PolicyGun ControlMartin O'Malley

I am a retired physician. During my first two years in practice I was an emergency room physician and saw some horrific injuries. Because of those experiences I want to see real solutions to the gun madness

We know that Australia's 17-year-old assault weapons ban has helped prevent further massacres, that you don't need a weapon of war to protect yourself or your family — handguns or shotguns work just as well — and that Second Amendment rights are not imperiled. Denial of these facts is irrational.

Our moral principle should be to do no harm. Gov. Martin O'Malley's proposed reforms will not harm anyone's ability to protect their family or to hunt, nor will they infringe on anyone's Second Amendment rights.

But "do no harm" does not mean do nothing. Another moral principle is to do the right thing. Intervening to prevent loss of life is the right thing to do. To do nothing in that situation would be immoral.

If opponents of gun control block reforms this year, and next year we have another Newtown shooting, they will know, deep inside, that they are cowards who did not have the courage to do the right thing. And that is something that will be on their consciences for the rest of their lives.

Robert L Seward, Forest Grove, Ore.

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    Personal Weapon ControlInterior PolicyGun ControlMartin O'Malley
    • Politicians who claim to understand gun crime don't have a clue [Letter]
      Politicians who claim to understand gun crime don't have a clue [Letter]

      The two clowns in Annapolis who claim to understand gun crime don't have a clue ("O'Malley, Brown are kidding themselves with the 2013 Firearms Safety Act," Oct. 6).

    • Maryland's gun law is working
      Maryland's gun law is working

      The gun lobby's lawsuit against Maryland's life-saving Firearm Safety Act described in Saturday's front page article does not challenge the constitutionality of the key provision of the act — requiring handgun purchasers to first obtain a fingerprint based background check and license...

    • Md. gun law is working [Letter]
      Md. gun law is working [Letter]

      Jack Mccauley's letter belittling the Firearms Safety Act fails to mention the most important parts of the new law — the requirement that handgun purchasers get a fingerprint-based license and the authority for the state police to regulate firearms dealers ("O'Malley, Brown are kidding...

    • Gun law doesn't make Marylanders safer [Letter]
      Gun law doesn't make Marylanders safer [Letter]

      Lt. Gov. Anthony Brown's recent commentary on Maryland's 2013 Firearms Safety Act is disingenuous and deceitful ("Brown: I will enforce gun safety law," Oct. 2).

    • A wasteful death by Uzi [Letter]

      Though I seriously doubt it, I wonder if a gun advocate or a member of National Rifle Association could explain to me why a 9-year-old girl needs weapons training ("An Uzi, a 9-year-old and American exceptionalism," Aug. 31). When I first read about the 9-year-old girl who had accidentally...

    • The city's problem isn't guns, it's gangs [Letter]
      The city's problem isn't guns, it's gangs [Letter]

      While I agree with letter writer Pat Ranney that Baltimore has a serious gun violence problem, she is incorrectly placing blame on an inanimate object. Guns don't pull the trigger, people do ("Baltimore's violence won't end until we stand up to the gun lobby," Aug. 14).

    Comments
    Loading