Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Gun owners should be required to carry liability insurance on their weapons

The debate over gun violence has focused on restricting sales of military-style assault weapons, semiautomatic pistols and background checks. Where is the concern for the victims of shooting?

The Declaration of Independence states "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness." One bullet can rob a person of all these rights.

The news media reports shootings in terms of how many victims there were and whether they died at the scene or at a local hospital. But what about the rest of the story? Does a family lose a husband and father? Do survivors ever regain their full health and careers, or are they subject to years of multiple surgeries, therapy and a life of dependency?

Victims of gun violence should be compensated for their physical and mental suffering, long-term disabilities, loss of relationships and other traumas. Liability insurance, similar to medical malpractice insurance, should be available to protect gun owners, dealers and manufacturers and to provide for victims of gun violence.

Such measures do not infringe on Second Amendment rights, but they do focus on the serious responsibility that goes with gun ownership and encourage gun owners to maintain control of their weapons at all times.

Sherman R. Reed

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • What gun rights and marriage equality (should) have in common

    What gun rights and marriage equality (should) have in common

    In the article, "A unique Maryland marriage sits at center of Supreme Court case considering gay nuptials" (March 13), Carrie Evans, executive director of Equality Maryland, is quoted as saying the following:

  • Maryland's gun law is working

    Maryland's gun law is working

    The gun lobby's lawsuit against Maryland's life-saving Firearm Safety Act described in Saturday's front page article does not challenge the constitutionality of the key provision of the act — requiring handgun purchasers to first obtain a fingerprint based background check and license from the...

  • Guns and the 'permanent darkness'

    Guns and the 'permanent darkness'

    By overwhelming margins, polls show Americans support universal background checks for those seeking to purchase a firearm to help keep guns out of the hands of criminals and those who are dangerously mentally ill. Clearly, the last thing you want is for some paranoid personality, ranting and raving...

  • NRA's paranoia is catching

    NRA's paranoia is catching

    The Sun's editorial reflecting on the National Rifle Association convention in Nashville is an important statement on how the NRA has devalued our lives and our society ("Guns and the 'permanent darkness,'" April 16).

  • NRA selectively interprets 2nd Amendment

    NRA selectively interprets 2nd Amendment

    As sure as nine people have been butchered by yet another gun-wielding maniac, there will be an outcry for more laws controlling the sale and registration of firearms, and the NRA will again claim they are heroically upholding the Second Amendment rights of every American citizen by opposing such...

  • Hogan, guns and the attorneys general

    Hogan, guns and the attorneys general

    During the recent gubernatorial campaign, The Sun and several thoughtful citizens were perplexed about the discrepancy between the National Rifle Association's notorious A- rating for Larry Hogan and the candidate's repeated promise that he won't overturn Maryland's gun law if elected. In fact,...

Comments
Loading

77°