Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

No compelling reason to own an assault rifle

I feel compelled to respond to Christian Wilson's letter ("Quick-fix legislation won't solve our gun violence problem," Dec. 31). The author really made a compelling case for gun laws, the opposite of what he intended. He is correct that laws cannot keep everyone from doing violence. That is why dangerous weapons like assault rifles should not be readily available. Does anyone think that Adam Lanza would attack an elementary school with a hammer? If he did, there would probably be no one dead there.

Mr. Wilson does not seem to know that we are a nation of laws. Although making a law does not mean everyone will obey, a lot of people will. Has not Mr. Wilson seen the low murder rates in places where all guns are outlawed, such as Great Britain and Japan? Gun laws do seem to work quite well in those countries.

I understand why someone owns a hunting rifle. And although I disagree with owning a handgun, I do see why someone may own one thinking that they can protect themselves. However, I can see no reason for an assault rifle. What do you do with them? Hang them on the wall so you can show your friends what a cool toy you have? Occasionally take one to a shooting range? In that case, let's keep them locked up at the shooting range. It seems to me that one of the main reasons for having an assault rifle is that they can be left unlocked around the house for someone of questionable mental health to murder people.

Barry Burns, Towson

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • What gun rights and marriage equality (should) have in common

    What gun rights and marriage equality (should) have in common

    In the article, "A unique Maryland marriage sits at center of Supreme Court case considering gay nuptials" (March 13), Carrie Evans, executive director of Equality Maryland, is quoted as saying the following:

  • Maryland's gun law is working

    Maryland's gun law is working

    The gun lobby's lawsuit against Maryland's life-saving Firearm Safety Act described in Saturday's front page article does not challenge the constitutionality of the key provision of the act — requiring handgun purchasers to first obtain a fingerprint based background check and license from the...

  • Guns and the 'permanent darkness'

    Guns and the 'permanent darkness'

    By overwhelming margins, polls show Americans support universal background checks for those seeking to purchase a firearm to help keep guns out of the hands of criminals and those who are dangerously mentally ill. Clearly, the last thing you want is for some paranoid personality, ranting and raving...

  • NRA's paranoia is catching

    NRA's paranoia is catching

    The Sun's editorial reflecting on the National Rifle Association convention in Nashville is an important statement on how the NRA has devalued our lives and our society ("Guns and the 'permanent darkness,'" April 16).

  • NRA selectively interprets 2nd Amendment

    NRA selectively interprets 2nd Amendment

    As sure as nine people have been butchered by yet another gun-wielding maniac, there will be an outcry for more laws controlling the sale and registration of firearms, and the NRA will again claim they are heroically upholding the Second Amendment rights of every American citizen by opposing such...

  • Hogan, guns and the attorneys general

    Hogan, guns and the attorneys general

    During the recent gubernatorial campaign, The Sun and several thoughtful citizens were perplexed about the discrepancy between the National Rifle Association's notorious A- rating for Larry Hogan and the candidate's repeated promise that he won't overturn Maryland's gun law if elected. In fact,...

Comments
Loading

75°