Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Maryland can reduce murder rate with 'right to carry' law

The Sun should be commended for publishing such an extensive article on the "right to carry" laws in Maryland and putting it in clear terms that anyone can understand ("Gun laws' sketchy effect," March 11). The bottom line, according to the academics, is that restrictions or a lack of restrictions make no difference. However, it's complicated because on one hand, "the right to carry" concealed guns does decrease the murder rates and on the other hand, "the right to carry" will "slightly increase the number of aggravated assaults." Considering Baltimore has one of the highest murder rates in the nation, I believe decreasing the murder rate would be a great thing, and accepting a slight increase in the number of aggravated assaults would be a good compromise.

This is a no-brainer, abide by the Second Amendment of our Constitution and stop using to old worn out ploy of "it's for the safety of the public" that Maryland has a "may issue" law instead of a "shall issue." Keep in mind that criminals don't care about laws whereas only honest citizens do care — but also have a right to protect themselves.

Edward Moshang, Towson

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Jovan Belcher didn't need a gun to kill his girlfriend

    Your editorial on the apparent murder-suicide Involving Kansas City Chiefs linebacker Jovan Belcher and his girlfriend, Kasandra Perkins, noted approvingly sportscaster Bob Costas' opinion that "if Jovan Belcher didn't possess a gun, he and Kasandra Perkins would both be alive today" ("The...

  • Why can't Md. veterans carry concealed weapons?

    As a 25-year retired veteran of the U.S. Army Reserves, a year of which I served on active duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom, I find Maryland lawmakers' unwillingness to support veterans' right to carry concealed handguns disheartening.

  • A welcome break from the silence around gun control

    In response to the editorial on guns in The Sun ("The missing issue: guns," Nov. 5) and a recent show on gun control on WYPR with Dan Rodricks interviewing Johns Hopkins professor Daniel Webster about a report by the Center for Gun Policy and research at the Bloomberg School of Public Health at...

  • An unarmed populace has much to fear

    Letter writer John Holter ("Most people are better off not owning guns," Aug. 13) expressed the notion that most people are better off not owning firearms. His opinion, along with the decision on whether or not to own a gun, is one of the many rights that we enjoy in this country. I, for one,...

  • Mass shootings: Bad for America, good for the NRA
    Mass shootings: Bad for America, good for the NRA

    Through a sick symbiosis, the gun lobby profits from horrible crimes

  • Most people are better off not owning firearms

    People who think they need a gun for protection should ask themselves this question: Do you know how to use that weapon when your heart is pounding at 140 beats a minute? Have you practiced what it is like to be in the dark and reaching for a gun? Have you ever aimed a weapon at anyone before?

  • In Baltimore, everyday echoes of mass shootings

    The recent mass shootings in Aurora, Colo., and at a Sikh temple in Wisconsin have once again brought the issue of gun control to the forefront of American political debate ("Sikh gathering Baltimore had just finished when 'terrible news of shooting at Wisconsin temple broke,'" Aug. 5 )....

  • Guns and terrorism, American style

    Six Sikhs have died in a gurdwara in Milwaukee thanks to an angry white supremacist named Wade Michael Page, who authorities say barged in there with an assault rifle and shot worshipers down in cold blood ("Shooter had hate-group ties," Aug. 7). In what can only be described as a tragic irony,...

Comments
Loading