Get unlimited digital access to $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Judge's decision on Md. assault weapons ban makes no one safer [Letter]

U.S. District Judge Catherine Blake's decision upholding Maryland's assault weapons ban isn't a victory for anyone ("A victory for public safety," Aug. 14).

Explain this to me, why aren't all law enforcement personnel included in this law? I mean if a maximum of 10 rounds is sufficient for the law abiding citizen in order to protect and defend their property and family, shouldn't it be sufficient for the police? Especially since they are well trained with their firearms, not to mention they often have the back-up of other officers available.

We know that criminals don't follow the law, and regardless of the banning large-capacity ammunition magazines, you can be sure that they will have whatever capacity they desire.

Your answer to the question of why law enforcement isn't included in the law would be something like, "their firearms need to be at least equivalent to or greater than what they may come up against with the criminal element" — right!

Aren't gun owners of Maryland entitled to the same "equal ground"?

C. Titus

To respond to this letter, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Maryland's gun law is working
    Maryland's gun law is working

    The gun lobby's lawsuit against Maryland's life-saving Firearm Safety Act described in Saturday's front page article does not challenge the constitutionality of the key provision of the act — requiring handgun purchasers to first obtain a fingerprint based background check and license...

  • Md. gun law is working [Letter]
    Md. gun law is working [Letter]

    Jack Mccauley's letter belittling the Firearms Safety Act fails to mention the most important parts of the new law — the requirement that handgun purchasers get a fingerprint-based license and the authority for the state police to regulate firearms dealers ("O'Malley, Brown are kidding...

  • Gun law doesn't make Marylanders safer [Letter]
    Gun law doesn't make Marylanders safer [Letter]

    Lt. Gov. Anthony Brown's recent commentary on Maryland's 2013 Firearms Safety Act is disingenuous and deceitful ("Brown: I will enforce gun safety law," Oct. 2).

  • A wasteful death by Uzi [Letter]

    Though I seriously doubt it, I wonder if a gun advocate or a member of National Rifle Association could explain to me why a 9-year-old girl needs weapons training ("An Uzi, a 9-year-old and American exceptionalism," Aug. 31). When I first read about the 9-year-old girl who had accidentally...

  • The city's problem isn't guns, it's gangs [Letter]
    The city's problem isn't guns, it's gangs [Letter]

    While I agree with letter writer Pat Ranney that Baltimore has a serious gun violence problem, she is incorrectly placing blame on an inanimate object. Guns don't pull the trigger, people do ("Baltimore's violence won't end until we stand up to the gun lobby," Aug. 14).

  • Federal court ruling on assault rifle ban makes no sense [Letter]
    Federal court ruling on assault rifle ban makes no sense [Letter]

    The most popular rifle in America is the AR-15, which looks like M-16 but does not operate like one. Maryland's legislature banned the look in spite of fact that the function never matched ("Federal judge upholds assault rifle ban," Aug. 12).