Your recent editorial regarding gun control made a glaring error ("Carroll Co.'s nullification fantasy," May 24). In recounting the new gun law in Maryland, you stated that the only difference for handgun buyers was "that buyers provide their fingerprints as part of the application." The fingerprints are not for the application to purchase a handgun, but for a license that you must apply for before you fill out the application to purchase.
Your fingerprints are then submitted to the FBI, along with a separate form. That fingerprint check could take several months to accomplish and then Maryland State Police has 30 more days to issue the new license, something that has not existed until this new law. The total period of time for issuance of this newly-required license could extend well into four or five months prior to the purchase of your next handgun as of Oct. 1, 2013. Then you take your new license to a firearms retailer and fill out several more forms and wait for MSP to again check your background, every time you buy another handgun.
Since the state police are currently taking three months to conduct a seven-day background check, how in the world will they be able to issue up to 75,000 new licenses next year? They do not have the resources to accomplish this task, especially given that the new law doesn't increase their budget.
Requiring fingerprints to exercise a Constitutional right is just wrong. Perhaps the Sun should submit fingerprints to the state in order to write its editorials. Would you agree to that requirement?
Sanford Abrams, Owings MillsCopyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun