Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Speak out against gun control — if the General Assembly will let you

I am one of the thousands who took time away from work and my family to spend hours in Annapolis on Feb. 6 to attend the rally in opposition to Senate Bill 281 and the Senate committee hearing on the same proposal ("Opinions differ on Md. gun controls," Feb. 7).

I was appalled when at 9 p.m., the committee stated that it would no longer listen to the testimony of the hundreds who had waited all day and followed the necessary protocol to be heard. The committee would only hear the individual's name, place of residence, and if for or against the bill. Even before 9, members of the committee where calling citizens "chicken" and speaking over those who were giving professional testimony. This is an insult to every single one of those individuals' time, effort, and opinions. I find it deeply disturbing that the individuals who are elected and paid by the people could not respect the public. They should have listened politely and they should have sat in their chairs until every last one of their constituents, who were not being paid to be there, had their full say.

I urge our state, its citizens and its politicians, to not support this bill or any of its companion bills. This legislation will not solve the problem of gun violence. It will not keep the guns out of the hands of criminals. It will only give criminals more confidence in knowing that the opposition to them will be minimized.

Specifically, I strongly oppose the licensing portion of this bill. It is essentially a poll tax that will violate the civil rights of all and it will limit lower-income families from exercising their Second Amendment rights. Maryland already has a record of every firearm purchased in the state. Licensing will not give the state added information and will not keep those who are already obtaining guns illegally from obtaining them. Additionally, how exactly is an individual supposed to demonstrate "proficiency and use" of a firearm, which is required in order to obtain a license, if they are not able to rent or own a gun before obtaining that license?

Maryland legislators are acting to limit the penalties for criminals (witness the current push to abolish the death penalty) at the same time they are attempting to pass gun legislation that will not harm the criminal but the law-abiding citizen. This truly is contradictory. If the goal is to make Maryland safer, they should pass legislation that will create mandatory sentences for crimes committed with a firearm and for those who assist individuals in obtaining the firearm illegally. Let's crack down on the criminal, not the law-abiding citizens who only wish to exercise their constitutional rights.

It is the responsibility of all of us to speak out and let their representatives know how we feel. Please do not become complacent and think that others will speak for you. We must show our representatives that opposition to this bill and any companion bill is very strong. The fight for Second Amendment rights will not stop. Please protect your rights and oppose this bill.

Mindy Haines, Millersville

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • License gun purchases

    License gun purchases

    Thanks to Rep. Donna Edwards for her eloquent op-ed on the need to do more to prevent gun violence ("Dealing with guns demands more than another moment of silence," July 7).

  • NRA selectively interprets 2nd Amendment

    NRA selectively interprets 2nd Amendment

    As sure as nine people have been butchered by yet another gun-wielding maniac, there will be an outcry for more laws controlling the sale and registration of firearms, and the NRA will again claim they are heroically upholding the Second Amendment rights of every American citizen by opposing such...

  • Do concealed guns reduce crime? Let's find out

    Do concealed guns reduce crime? Let's find out

    Despite expert opinions, statistics and moral condemnations, the debate on gun control continues. Until the law permits everyone who wants to carry a concealed weapon to do so legally, there is insufficient data to decide for or against ("How to reduce gun violence," June 12).

  • How to reduce gun violence

    How to reduce gun violence

    At a time when Baltimore could desperately use some good news when it comes to the prospects of reducing violence, research from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health suggests we may already have taken a key step toward preventing gun homicides — it just may take a few years for us...

  • NRA's paranoia is catching

    NRA's paranoia is catching

    The Sun's editorial reflecting on the National Rifle Association convention in Nashville is an important statement on how the NRA has devalued our lives and our society ("Guns and the 'permanent darkness,'" April 16).

  • Guns and the 'permanent darkness'

    Guns and the 'permanent darkness'

    By overwhelming margins, polls show Americans support universal background checks for those seeking to purchase a firearm to help keep guns out of the hands of criminals and those who are dangerously mentally ill. Clearly, the last thing you want is for some paranoid personality, ranting and raving...

  • Fix the background check

    Fix the background check

    As inspiring and overdue as America's reassessment of the Confederate battle flag has been since last month's Charleston shootings, those who wish to truly honor the victims need to set their sights to an even higher purpose. Late last week, FBI director James Comey acknowledged that alleged shooter...

  • What gun rights and marriage equality (should) have in common

    What gun rights and marriage equality (should) have in common

    In the article, "A unique Maryland marriage sits at center of Supreme Court case considering gay nuptials" (March 13), Carrie Evans, executive director of Equality Maryland, is quoted as saying the following:

Comments
Loading

82°