Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Both the public and private sectors have their good and bad points

Columnist Thomas Schaller makes a very solid argument about the relative ability of the government and free markets to get things done ("Government is flawed, but markets are too," May 15). His critics' arguments, however, fall flat.

One reader wrote that competition in the private sector this leads to greater efficiency and better outcomes. But this argument fails to take into account the effect of monopolies and oligopolies on the supposed free market. Many industries are so expensive to get into that only a few players run the show (think of cable TV and energy).

Another reader wrote that government workers feel secure in their jobs and have little incentive to perform well. The problem, however, is that state, county and municipal governments have been laying-off a lot of workers lately. That's not much job security.

Moreover, many government sector jobs don't pay very well (if you want proof, look at the online advertisements for Maryland state jobs). Thus, the hope for a promotion to a higher-salaried position provides the incentive to perform well. Also, the notion that people will only work hard if they're constantly afraid of being fired is cynical and, frankly, absurd.

Sometimes people feel that the profit motive of the private sector leads to more efficient outcomes. And sometimes it does. But sometimes the lust for profit leads to cutting corners, sweatshop labor conditions or white collar crime.

Anyone who is looking at the world without blinders on should be able to recognize that both the government and the private sector have their pros and cons. Mr. Schaller did a good job of highlighting this. We should be looking for ways to improve both the public and the private sector, not eliminate one or the other.

Brent McKee, Arnold

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Why government can't match the private sector

    Thomas Schaller make a case for how the private sector can be just as if not more flawed than the public sector ("Sure, government is flawed – but markets are too," May 16). One aspect of the comparison that he (perhaps intentionally?) failed to mention, however, is that in the private sector,...

  • Schaller fails to see danger of U.S. debt

    Columnist Thomas F. Schaller's analysis is incredibly myopic ("Avoiding Europe's austerity nightmare," April 18). To compare the economic condition of the U.S. to those of Greece or Spain at the beginning of the economic crisis is comparing apples and oranges.

  • Government can't dictate upward mobility

    I have habitually and patiently read Thomas F. Schaller's column for some time now. His most recent ("An American recipe for class immobility," Feb. 21) warrants a response.

  • Why the free ads for Under Armour?
    Why the free ads for Under Armour?

    It is appalling what has happened in Baltimore during the protest. One thing that stood out, at least too me, was on national television and pictures in the newspapers was the marketing power of Under Armour. The company was a financial winner ("Under Armour remains committed to Baltimore despite...

  • In riots' wake, we expect more from our leaders
    In riots' wake, we expect more from our leaders

    In response to KAL's Sunday cartoon and Wes Moore's op-ed, I start with the presumption that our elected leaders are more motivated by the best interests of Baltimore than they are by their narrow interest in re-election, that our business leaders are more motivated by an interest in long-term...

  • Baltimore woes a tale of two cities
    Baltimore woes a tale of two cities

    The conflagrations that were Chicago and Detroit in 1968 after the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. and Los Angeles in 1991 following the Rodney King case show the potential for what Baltimore might have become. But Baltimore happened for a hugely different reason.