Summer Sale! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Both the public and private sectors have their good and bad points

Columnist Thomas Schaller makes a very solid argument about the relative ability of the government and free markets to get things done ("Government is flawed, but markets are too," May 15). His critics' arguments, however, fall flat.

One reader wrote that competition in the private sector this leads to greater efficiency and better outcomes. But this argument fails to take into account the effect of monopolies and oligopolies on the supposed free market. Many industries are so expensive to get into that only a few players run the show (think of cable TV and energy).

Another reader wrote that government workers feel secure in their jobs and have little incentive to perform well. The problem, however, is that state, county and municipal governments have been laying-off a lot of workers lately. That's not much job security.

Moreover, many government sector jobs don't pay very well (if you want proof, look at the online advertisements for Maryland state jobs). Thus, the hope for a promotion to a higher-salaried position provides the incentive to perform well. Also, the notion that people will only work hard if they're constantly afraid of being fired is cynical and, frankly, absurd.

Sometimes people feel that the profit motive of the private sector leads to more efficient outcomes. And sometimes it does. But sometimes the lust for profit leads to cutting corners, sweatshop labor conditions or white collar crime.

Anyone who is looking at the world without blinders on should be able to recognize that both the government and the private sector have their pros and cons. Mr. Schaller did a good job of highlighting this. We should be looking for ways to improve both the public and the private sector, not eliminate one or the other.

Brent McKee, Arnold

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Why government can't match the private sector

    Thomas Schaller make a case for how the private sector can be just as if not more flawed than the public sector ("Sure, government is flawed – but markets are too," May 16). One aspect of the comparison that he (perhaps intentionally?) failed to mention, however, is that in the private sector,...

  • Schaller fails to see danger of U.S. debt

    Columnist Thomas F. Schaller's analysis is incredibly myopic ("Avoiding Europe's austerity nightmare," April 18). To compare the economic condition of the U.S. to those of Greece or Spain at the beginning of the economic crisis is comparing apples and oranges.

  • Government can't dictate upward mobility

    I have habitually and patiently read Thomas F. Schaller's column for some time now. His most recent ("An American recipe for class immobility," Feb. 21) warrants a response.

  • Pope Francis catches up with God on abortion

    Regarding your story "Pope to allow priests to absolve abortion in holy year," Sept. 3), I'm so glad the Pope is on board, because God has been forgiving abortions since the first one occurred.

  • Harbaugh brings integrity and class to the job

    Harbaugh brings integrity and class to the job

    Media critic David Zurawik calls Ravens coach John Harbaugh arrogant ("Harbaugh acted like a jerk, but it's basically a Ravens production," Aug. 30). Really?

  • Missing lesson: respect for authority

    Missing lesson: respect for authority

    Living in Maryland has become shameful. How can a prosecuting attorney charge police officers for putting Freddie Gray in a police wagon uninjured? They did nothing to cause his injuries. It's causing hatred of the disadvantaged toward police ("Rallies set for Gray hearing," Sept. 1).

Comments
Loading
81°