Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99
News Opinion Readers Respond

GOP can't hide true agenda

I just read Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s plan to bring the Republican Party back to relevance, and I have to say my sides are still sore from the best laugh I've had in ages ("A midterm election agenda for the GOP," Feb. 10).

So, Mr. Ehrlich thinks changing the window dressing will get women and minorities on board with their agenda of hatred of the very people they think are going to vote for them? Oh, please! These elderly white fossils are never going to appeal to anyone beyond their shrinking base.

I think it's very telling that the same day Mr. Ehrlich is busy tilting at the proverbial electoral windmills, another story surfaces that is far more indicative of the true Republican Party and their agenda of evil: Republicans in New Mexico are pushing a new law that will charge rape victims with a felony if they try get an abortion.

That's right folks, not only do Republicans think a rape-baby is a gift from God, they think that the woman is the real criminal when it happens. I guess her crime is having a reproductive system.

If Mr. Ehrlich is really serious about appealing to any voting bloc besides angry racists, just putting a new face on their message of hate and racism isn't going to do anything. If the Republicans expect to ever be relevant again, they are going to have to clean house and get rid of all their 18th century ideas and the nut jobs who believe in them.

William Smith, Baltimore

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • Ehrlich too negative, too partisan
      Ehrlich too negative, too partisan

      Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s cocky and aggressive partisanship make it evident why he couldn't govern effectively in Annapolis and was not re-elected for a second term ("Why Obama is viewed as weak," Nov. 30).

    • Ehrlich's delusions of grandeur
      Ehrlich's delusions of grandeur

      The Sun's front page recently carried the article, "Ehrlich entertains presidential hopes" (Dec. 3), yet it was not April 1. Surely, this was a joke. It's even more preposterous than Martin O'Malley running for president!

    • Ehrlich's 'cult of anti-Obamaism'
      Ehrlich's 'cult of anti-Obamaism'

      Though I am 1960s retread boomer and unrepentant liberal who usually disagrees commentator Robert L. Ehrlich Jr., I read his column regularly. No surprise that he recently panned Obamacare — again — but what I never hear from Republicans is the Plan B, i.e., how we deal with the...

    • Obamacare is a 'varsity stinker'
      Obamacare is a 'varsity stinker'

      OK, I can't help myself. Over the past three years, I have written at least a dozen columns critical of Obamacare (a.k.a. The "Affordable Care Act") in this space and devoted an entire chapter to the topic in my book "America: Hope for Change."

    • Hillary all over again
      Hillary all over again

      With the exception of President Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton is the most recognized American politician of this era. Today, she is far and away the Democratic front runner for president. Many believe she is the odds on favorite to win it all — a view supported by a variety of public...

    • What Obama should have said
      What Obama should have said

      Here is what President Barack Obama should have said when he addressed the American people after his party's massive losses in Tuesday's election:

    • Ehrlich mistaken on tax burden
      Ehrlich mistaken on tax burden

      Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. does not look at the big picture. Is this because he is not interested in giving a fair presentation? In his most recent column (tax bill for government at all levels.

    • Ehrlich gets the numbers wrong
      Ehrlich gets the numbers wrong

      I'm often perplexed by the content in Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s column and wonder if he is free from fact-checking because his words appear on the op-ed page. One particular paragraph in his column, "American values under Obama" (Nov. 2), left me even more confused than usual.

    Comments
    Loading