Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

A Republican 'civil war'?

Once again, I am shocked by the blatantly biased treatment many media outlets continue to heap on the Republican Party ("GOP struggles to overcome adversity," Aug. 23).

The coverage of the appointment of two new state senators, one from Democratic Montgomery County, the other from the Republican Eastern Shore, has been decidedly slanted.

In both cases there are furtive communications and ill-natured jockeying on all sides affecting the central committee decisions. However, as far as the media is concerned, all is good in Montgomery County, while there is a "virtual civil war" going on in the Republican Party.

In fact, as the Washington Post reported Aug.10, there is serious discontent among minorities in Montgomery County over the all-white makeup of the county Senate delegation, despite the fact that Montgomery is a majority-minority county.

Professor Bilal Ayyub, the handpicked candidate of several minority community groups, withdrew from consideration Aug. 26, claiming that the Montgomery County Democratic Central Committee had already decided to appoint Del. Brian Feldman as a result of aggressive lobbying and endorsements from other powerful elected officials. But is there now a brewing race war in the Democratic Party?

On the Republican side, by contrast, there are more than a dozen candidates vying for four county central committees. Like the Democrats, there are accusations of lobbying and behind-the-scenes maneuvering. However, there is no indication that this is anything more than jostling between two sets of supporters of for two sitting delegates.

On the Democratic side you actually have current, white elected officials preventing the diversification of the caucus representing a majority-minority county. I have a hard time believing the Republicans are the only ones facing a "civil war."

Jack Lucas

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Rushing to war with Syria would be a big mistake

    Regarding your recent editorial on the U.S. response to reports of Syria's use of chemical weapons, America's rush to war against Syria is dangerous, unnecessary, unwanted and unconstitutional ("Punishing Syria," Aug. 26).

  • Baltimore needs BRT

    Baltimore needs BRT

    Recently, Lt. Gov. Boyd Rutherford announced that Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) should be considered as an alternative instead of the now-shelved Red Line light rail system ("Who knew Hogan, Rutherford were such transit geeks," July 15). Why? Costs. Light rail is extremely expensive — to the tune of...

  • Orioles: No gnomes, please

    Orioles: No gnomes, please

    In light of the Orioles recent near-death spiral, many fans have pinned the blame on the Buck Showalter Garden Gnome giveaway ("Buck Showalter garden gnome briefly causes long lines at Camden Yards," June 28). True, their record since the promotion has been dismal and Buck Showalter was warned...

  • Baltimore remains a fiber desert

    Baltimore remains a fiber desert

    Like Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake's Smarter Baltimore draft report, the commentary, "Broadband for Baltimore" (July 27), has solid recommendations for building high speed Internet in Baltimore. But like that report, it ignores the principal reason that Baltimore City doesn't have broadband. Verizon's...

  • The evil of Iran

    The evil of Iran

    We sat 5,000-plus strong in the Walter E. Washington Convention Center in the District of Columbia for three intense days of Christians United For Israel (CUFI) 10th summit on July 12-14. We came from all across the nation (including 95 members from other countries and 500 college students). We...

  • Iran deal — war now or war later

    Iran deal — war now or war later

    In its recent editorial, The Sun adopts President Barack Obama's primary argument in favor of the Iran deal — that the only choice is the deal or war ("A 'good enough' agreement," July 24). No one wants war. But the choice here is not war or no war. It is war now or war later.