Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
NewsOpinionReaders Respond

Israel should keep the Golan Heights until Syria makes peace

IsraelBritainYom Kippur

Regarding Ramzi and Noura Hemady's recent commentary on Syria's Golan Heights, the authors ignore three critical facts when it comes to the ultimate possession of that disputed territory ("Let people of the Golan decide their fate," Feb. 8).

First, based on biblical and current history, the presence of Israel is justified in that strategic region. Second, there are now over 20,000 Israelis living on the Golan Heights with extensive agricultural development.

Third, Syria has refused to negotiate for the return of the Golan Heights in exchange for making peace with Israel.

Incidentally, the Golan Heights was part of the U.N. British Mandate for a Jewish homeland, but through an unauthorized agreement between Britain and France, Great Britain gave the area to France in exchange for oil rights.

Syria has mounted attacks on Israel from the Golan Heights starting with the founding of the Jewish nation in 1948 and culminating with the 1973 Yom Kippur War. When Syria ruled the area it continuously rocketed and shelled Jewish cities and towns in northern Israel.

The Golan Heights has always been a strategic region for Israel's security. Until Syria recognizes Israel in a formal peace treaty, Israel has no option but to retain that historically, religiously and strategically vital area.

Nelson Marans, Silver Spring

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    IsraelBritainYom Kippur
    • Israel has acted responsibly against Hamas [Letter]
      Israel has acted responsibly against Hamas [Letter]

      The recent letter writer critical of Israeli actions in Gaza ("Israel committed war crimes during its invasion of Gaza," Oct. 1) conveniently forgets the origins of the Gaza conflict and the effort that Israel made to reduce civilian casualties. Hamas for the last eight years has been...

    • Hopkins is hypocritical on academic freedom
      Hopkins is hypocritical on academic freedom

      On Sept. 26, an interdisciplinary cohort of students, faculty and staff at Johns Hopkins University answered President Ronald Daniel's call to join the conversation on academic freedom, which he wrote, "deserves dialogue and debate" ("Hopkins welcomes debate on academic...

    Comments
    Loading