Get unlimited digital access to $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Tariff and secession caused Civil War, not slavery

Reporter Arthur Hirsch's article on the recent article on the re-enactment at the 150th anniversary of the Battle of Gettysburg included a familiar Civil War anecdote about a Confederate soldier who had been captured at Fort Donelson ("A defining day relived," July 2). Responding to a question from his Union captors, he famously answered, "We're fighting because y'all are down here." As a source of empirical evidence, this tale invites profoundly misleading interpretation: There is a duty to disclose the message actually intended by a Rebel who spoke his answer fully seven months before Lincoln issued the preliminary Emancipation Proclamation.

The Civil War came because Southern states seceded. However, with 15 slave states by 1860, President Abraham Lincoln and the slaveholders had well known that a Constitutional Amendment ending slavery would never be feasible. It was accordingly obvious that Southerners opted for secession as the remedy for a different grievance altogether — egregiously inequitable effects of a U.S. protective tariff that generated 90 percent of federal revenue. Foreign governments retaliated for it with tariffs of their own, and payment of those overseas levies represented the cost to all Americans of their U.S. government, or 90 percent of that cost.

Southerners generated two-thirds of America's exports and also bore two-thirds of those retaliatory tariffs abroad. In other words, the Old South carried 60 percent of a federal load resulting directly from levy of protective tariffs on imported foreign goods. The 18.5 percent of U.S. citizens who resided in the Old South bore a share of federal government cost that was three times their proportionate obligation.

Southerners could not hope for relief from the retaliatory tariffs overseas unless their trading partners could be relieved of the onerous federal tariff levied throughout the U.S. Offered the Old South by President Lincoln was nothing by way of fiscal reform at all. And so, that Fort Donelson captive only paraphrased Confederate leadership — a leadership determined to throw off a U.S. government that, if allowed to remain "down here," would forever impose economic subservience upon Southerners who consequently had no honorable alternative to secession.

Dennis G. Saunders, Columbia

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Don't give a free pass to polluters, Mr. Hogan
    Don't give a free pass to polluters, Mr. Hogan

    I am a 79-year-old retired assistant superintendent of Baltimore County Public Schools and a former resident of Dundalk. I lived and worked in the Dundalk area for over 50 years. Though I am retired, I was active in Dundalk leading community projects and civic organizations for many of those...

  • Replace the B&P tunnel
    Replace the B&P tunnel

    There's an elephant in the room underneath West Baltimore that no one is talking about. While transit supporters and critics fight over the fate of the Red and Purple lines, this elephant grows bigger. The elephant in question is the Baltimore and Potomac tunnel ("From vibrations to mosquitoes,...

  • Spend HUD grant on housing, not government
    Spend HUD grant on housing, not government

    Wasn't there a 10-year plan to rid Baltimore of its homeless? Trust me, too many jobs are connected to the $48.3 million federal grant to housing and service programs in Maryland so that is never going to happen ("$48.3M awarded to homeless services programs in Maryland," Jan. 26)!

  • Hogan should support air pollution rules
    Hogan should support air pollution rules

    Two days ago, I was watching an adorable young girl running on the playground in Baltimore chasing her father and trying to catch him. Eventually, she plopped down near me and we started chatting. After asking her if she had caught her father, she said that she really hadn't actually caught...

  • Md. should exercise caution on the economy
    Md. should exercise caution on the economy

    Why is Del. Maggie McIntosh so confident that the economy is going to bring Maryland out of its financial problems this year ("Budget to have lasting effect," Jan. 27)? Obviously she does not follow the same financial news outlets that I do.

  • Hogan should support Red, Purple lines
    Hogan should support Red, Purple lines

    Kudos to Gov. Larry Hogan for preserving money in his budget for the Red and Purple lines ("Hogan budget would cut state worker pay, city school aid," Jan. 22) while he considers their future. As the governor moves toward a final decision, he will have the opportunity to review work done by...