Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

There is no proportionate response to terror [Letter]

I appreciate the valid points made by Bruce Knauff in his letter to The Baltimore Sun regarding the latest Israeli-Palestinian conflict ("Conflict over Gaza is one-sided," July 16). Allow me to respond to the idea that it is a one-sided conflict and the notion that Israel uses disproportionate force.

We all remember what the streets of downtown Boston looked like in April 2013 during the aftermath of the marathon bombing. A war zone would be too weak of a description; it looked more like the aftermath of a military offensive. Here's a question: Why did the Boston Police Department respond so aggressively to the acts of two deranged teenagers? The answer is self-evident. When terrorists attack indiscriminately, there is no proportion. Terrorism is inherently not proportionate, so the response isn't either. The equivalent of a proportionate response to terrorism would be to place a bomb in a terrorist's face.

When it comes to the Israeli Army and Hamas terrorists, here's how some western journalists portray the conflict. "The media coverage hardly reflects the reality," writes Owen Jones in the Guardian. "A military superpower armed with F-15 fighter jets, AH-64 Apache helicopters, Delilah missiles, IAI Heron-1 drones and Jericho II missiles (and nuclear bombs, for that matter), versus a 'prison camp' firing almost entirely ineffective missiles."

A senior Hamas official who was quoted in Haaretz in response to a question about Hamas' rockets targeting civilians as well said that "everyone knows the rockets from Gaza are primitive and lack the destructive power of Israel's weapons. How many have they killed? You can't compare with an Israeli bomb that can destroy a 12-story building. It's just a sort of defense. We want to defend ourselves."

Hamas' rockets are ineffective not because they decided to go easy on their enemies but because of the miraculous Iron Dome defense system. And by the way, they have saved hundreds of Palestinians from becoming collateral damage as a response to Israeli deaths, and it's all thanks in part to America funding this project.

A pressure cooker bomb is also "almost entirely ineffective" but still managed to sow terror in the heart of Bostonians and brought on a disproportionate response. Should Israel start firing rockets into Gaza as a proportionate response? Mr. Owen still wouldn't be content because Hamas leaders don't have a rocket defense system such as Iron Dome. Does Israel have to supply them with an Iron Dome battery for the sake of proportion? Maybe Israel should hand them over some combat jets as well for good measure to minimize their underdog' status.

The only language terrorists understands is disproportion. There is no way of proportionately neutralizing terror.

Aryeh Rand

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Israel has acted responsibly against Hamas [Letter]
    Israel has acted responsibly against Hamas [Letter]

    The recent letter writer critical of Israeli actions in Gaza ("Israel committed war crimes during its invasion of Gaza," Oct. 1) conveniently forgets the origins of the Gaza conflict and the effort that Israel made to reduce civilian casualties. Hamas for the last eight years has been firing rockets...

  • Hold Israel accountable for war crimes
    Hold Israel accountable for war crimes

    The Sun editorial, "Horror in Peshawar" (Dec.16), describes the Taliban attack in Pakistan that left 140 children dead and states, "What happened there can only be described as an atrocity committed by murderous criminals." Why didn't The Sun equally condemn the actions of Israel, which caused...

  • Israel's actions in Gaza were self-defense
    Israel's actions in Gaza were self-defense

    In condemning Israel for finally taking action to counter terrorist and rocket attacks, Ray Gordon ignores the history of the last nine years of the conflict between Hamas and Israel ("Hold Israel accountable for war crimes," Dec. 23). After Israel voluntarily withdrew from Gaza without any reciprocity,...

  • What if Obama spoke to Knesset?
    What if Obama spoke to Knesset?

    I wonder how Benjamin Netanyahu would feel if President Barack Obama wrangled an invitation from an opposition Israeli politician to push the Obama-Iran plan in the Knesset without informing the Israeli prime minister ("Israel spy HQ bucking premier, opposing Iran sanctions," Jan. 23). But that's...

  • Netanyahu speech was pointed, not 'pointless'
    Netanyahu speech was pointed, not 'pointless'

    After reading the full text of the speech by Benjamin Netanyahu before the joint session of Congress, I beg to disagree with The Sun's analysis that the speech was pointless ("Netanyahu's speech," March 4). The Israeli prime minister described in detail the threat of a flawed nuclear agreement...

  • Netanyahu visit: Maybe Congress should delegate all its policy work to foreign leaders
    Netanyahu visit: Maybe Congress should delegate all its policy work to foreign leaders

    Has Speaker John Boehner has a brilliant idea in inviting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to speak to Congress on the subject of Iran ("Netanyahu invitation unwise," Jan. 27). What else can he do when, apparently, no Republicans in the House have what it takes to address the issue? Why...

  • Palestinians have more to answer for at the ICC than Israel
    Palestinians have more to answer for at the ICC than Israel

    I must respond to your recent report that the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court has launched a preliminary probe into alleged Israeli war crimes in the Palestinian territories ("International Criminal Court opens probe into possible war crimes in Palestinian territories," Jan. 17).

  • Let Netanyahu speak
    Let Netanyahu speak

    I find it necessary to respond to Frederic B. Hill's odious and erroneous op-ed, "Boehner's unwise move" (Jan. 28).

Comments
Loading

52°