Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Mayor wrong to marry gay couples

It was extremely disappointing to read in The Sun that Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake is planning to preside over same-sex marriages on June 16 here in Baltimore ("Mayor will preside over mass wedding of gay couples," May 20). I, and many others, believe her decision to do so speaks volumes about her understanding — or lack of understanding — of the moral issues surrounding same-sex marriages.

As a Christian and trusted political official, she must know the devastating long-range effects of such actions. Much worse is the violation of what is and has always been a sacred institution. While the mayor is indeed entitled to her own opinions, she is not entitled as mayor to make statements or do anything that would be condescending or speak for the people of Baltimore as if they were in agreement. Obviously, while her actions are a matter of prophecy, the church has a responsibility to speak out and discourage such behavior. Notwithstanding, this is not a matter of whose straight or gay, but a redefining of the sacredness of marriage which is a very serious challenge to biblical truth and our spiritual health as a nation.

It is unthinkable as well as unforgivable for this mayor to advocate such marriages even if only for political acceptance. It is wrong, unrighteous, and unacceptable. It is certainly a bold example of biblical defiance in an effort to recreate God and His word. However, because I know she is a caring person who tries to represent all the citizens of Baltimore, this is one issue she should have left to those individual persuasions and not shared her own. Maybe, just maybe, she should rethink her decision and instead champion those issues that will strengthen the moral conduct of our city.

Finally, while I am sure the mayor is a very decent and intelligent person, I am equally sure she is confused. The issue is not simply same-sex marriages but about our condemnation as a people and divine creation. Perhaps a conversation with Gov. Martin O'Malley on the subject wouldn't be a bad idea either.

Rev. Lynwood H. Leverette Sr., Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Religious freedom and the Constitution

    Religious freedom and the Constitution

    What many people forget is that the framers of our Constitution, through the First Amendment, sought to guarantee both freedom of religion and freedom from religion ("Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof").

  • Marriage equality can't wait

    Marriage equality can't wait

    In 1967 when the U.S. Supreme Court struck down laws banning interracial marriage in Loving v. Virginia, there was not a single dissent. Never mind that Virginia's anti-miscegenation statute had been in the books since 1924. The justices unanimously found discrimination in the institution of marriage...

  • Court's silence on marriage speaks volumes [Editorial]

    Court's silence on marriage speaks volumes [Editorial]

    Our view: Same-sex marriage is set to be legal in a majority of states, making eventual Supreme Court victory appear inevitable

  • Religious beliefs can't excuse discrimination

    Religious beliefs can't excuse discrimination

    A recent suggestion that some people should be exempt from serving gays because of their religious beliefs is nonsense. If you are licensed to provide a service or employed by the government to do so, you are required to perform that service without unlawful discrimination. Neither government employment...

  • Indiana learns discrimination is bad business

    Indiana learns discrimination is bad business

    The leaders of large corporations have not generally been at the vanguard of civil rights movements in this country. The average CEO is usually more concerned about stock valuations and quarterly dividends than about fighting discrimination. And when was the last time you saw the money-hungry NCAA...

  • Yes, some people do follow the Bible to the letter

    Yes, some people do follow the Bible to the letter

    In his recent column ("The conservative case for same-sex marriage," March 29), Eddie Zipperer gives three reasons why conservatives should favor same sex marriage. I find his second, poking fun at the Bible, to be both offensive and ignorant.

  • Selective reading of Leviticus won't justify bigotry

    Selective reading of Leviticus won't justify bigotry

    Letter writer Adam Goldfinger objected to Eddie Zipperer's references to Leviticus and states that he does indeed try to follow the laws in this book ("Yes, some people do follow the bible to the letter," April 3). I find myself wondering how many people Mr. Goldfinger has personally stoned to...

  • The struggle for gay rights isn't over

    The struggle for gay rights isn't over

    The reasoning behind the "righteous outrage" that commentator Jonah Goldberg uses to describe "know-nothings of every stripe" who are serious about protecting civil rights is twisted at best ("How do 'religious freedom' acts encourage discrimination?" April 3.)

Comments
Loading

73°