Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

For foster children, is having gay parents worse than having none at all?

Letter writer Bob Marshall of Richmond, Va., cites a biased study funded by two conservative think tanks as the ultimate authority on gay adoption both in Maryland and nationwide ("Vote no to immorality," Oct. 27).

What he does not mention, however, is that there are nearly 500,000 foster children in the U.S. without homes, and 100,000 who are actively looking for permanent families, only 20,000 of whom will eventually succeed.

Mr. Marshall owes some answers to the remaining 80,000 children who would love the strong foundation of family that a gay or lesbian couple could provide.

Is no home better than their home? Is no love better than their love? Is having no grandparents, cousins, aunts and uncles better than having their parents' nieces, nephews, brothers and sisters?

Is having no one assisting and guiding you through math homework better than a gay and lesbian couple coaching you? Is no one sitting on the sideline watching a baseball and soccer game better than your gay parents cheering you on?

Gay couples often adopt children that no one else will, providing them with a future that heterosexual couples refuse to take on. Please join this young heterosexual married man, not just in support of Question 6, but to support children, families, gays and lesbians and equal rights for everyone.

Vince Grey, Linthicum

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Marriage equality can't wait

    Marriage equality can't wait

    In 1967 when the U.S. Supreme Court struck down laws banning interracial marriage in Loving v. Virginia, there was not a single dissent. Never mind that Virginia's anti-miscegenation statute had been in the books since 1924. The justices unanimously found discrimination in the institution of marriage...

  • Religious freedom and the Constitution

    Religious freedom and the Constitution

    What many people forget is that the framers of our Constitution, through the First Amendment, sought to guarantee both freedom of religion and freedom from religion ("Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof").

  • How will Kennedy vote on same-sex marriage?

    How will Kennedy vote on same-sex marriage?

    As a long-time civics teacher I follow the Supreme Court's decisions very carefully. I have long admired Justice Anthony Kennedy because he is the swing vote on the court and his decisions are often unpredictable.

  • Court's silence on marriage speaks volumes [Editorial]

    Court's silence on marriage speaks volumes [Editorial]

    Our view: Same-sex marriage is set to be legal in a majority of states, making eventual Supreme Court victory appear inevitable

  • Religious beliefs can't excuse discrimination

    Religious beliefs can't excuse discrimination

    A recent suggestion that some people should be exempt from serving gays because of their religious beliefs is nonsense. If you are licensed to provide a service or employed by the government to do so, you are required to perform that service without unlawful discrimination. Neither government employment...

  • Equality in Alabama

    Equality in Alabama

    These are heady days for advocates of marriage equality. The Supreme Court is due to hear arguments this spring in a group of cases that could settle the question of a national Constitutional right to same-sex marriage, and this week, a decision not to enter a stay on the enforcement of a federal...

  • Yes, some people do follow the Bible to the letter

    Yes, some people do follow the Bible to the letter

    In his recent column ("The conservative case for same-sex marriage," March 29), Eddie Zipperer gives three reasons why conservatives should favor same sex marriage. I find his second, poking fun at the Bible, to be both offensive and ignorant.

  • Indiana learns discrimination is bad business

    Indiana learns discrimination is bad business

    The leaders of large corporations have not generally been at the vanguard of civil rights movements in this country. The average CEO is usually more concerned about stock valuations and quarterly dividends than about fighting discrimination. And when was the last time you saw the money-hungry NCAA...

Comments
Loading

72°