Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
NewsOpinionReaders Respond

Slim evidence to raise gas tax [Letter]

Fuel-efficient Vehicles

I have been reading numerous articles on how the transportation budget has been drastically declining, and the proposal is to raise the federal tax per gallon of gasoline. The premise is that with more fuel efficient vehicles on the road, those vehicles use less gas therefore pay less taxes while causing the same amount of damage to infrastructure.

My question to The Sun would be: How are you evaluating those conditions? We may have more fuel efficient vehicles, yes, we also have many more vehicles today than in 1956 ("The toll on U.S. roads," May 14).

I work in the transportation industry and constantly strive to find workable solutions to congestion on the roadways — an idea that we would not have considered an issue 50 years ago. Do you have any figures I could look at to verify that our country is losing money on the gasoline tax?

If you could look at tax per gallon per vehicle from just 20 years ago to today, that would be fascinating information that I would like to see. Vehicle counts continue to rise and gas use continues to rise so please show me numbers that verify that transportation is losing money so that your argument makes sense to me.

I truly do not mean to sound gruff, I just continue to see article after article on this issue and would like to see some figures to back up the claim.

Joyce Quackenbush

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
Fuel-efficient Vehicles
  • Put 'trust' back in Transportation Trust Fund [Letter]
    Put 'trust' back in Transportation Trust Fund [Letter]

    A proposed state constitutional amendment creating a firewall for the Transportation Trust Fund will be on the ballot this fall, and while the legislation is flawed, it deserves voter support. The legislation (Senate Bill 829 of 2013) received bipartisan support in both the House and Senate.

  • Highway funding needed — and concrete, too [Letter]
    Highway funding needed — and concrete, too [Letter]

    In regard to the commentary by Brian Dolan ("Get riled up over roadways," July 14), I am in a similar position to Mr. Dolan of the Maryland Asphalt Association, as I work for the Maryland Ready Mix Concrete Association. I, of course, disagree with Mr. Dolan's recent comments disparaging...

  • Concrete is not the problem [Letter]
    Concrete is not the problem [Letter]

    I've known Brian Dolan for nearly 25 years, back to a time when I was the concrete engineer and he was an assistant district engineer, both for the Maryland State Highway Administration. As old colleagues, I wasn't surprised to see his informative commentary on the state of our roads ("Get...

  • America is squandering a precious asset: its highways [Letter]
    America is squandering a precious asset: its highways [Letter]

    Brian Dolan's article, "Get riled up over roadways" (July 14), was extremely well written. Message received loud and clear. We need to be reminded of our crumbling infrastructure as we begin to accept it as the norm.

  • A temporary patch [Editorial]
    A temporary patch [Editorial]

    Our view: With the Highway Trust Fund within weeks of bankruptcy, Congress looks to kick the transportation can down the road

  • Gas tax is no solution [Letter]
    Gas tax is no solution [Letter]

    As usual, The Sun missed the real story — on purpose, I might add ("Pumping up gas prices," July 1). Gas prices have doubled since your savior took office in 2009. President Barack Obama has done almost nothing to make the U.S. energy independent (for example, no nuclear plants have...

Comments
Loading