Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Let transit users foot the bill for it, not motorists [Letter]

In response to your recent editorial support for increased gasoline taxes, I have no doubt that some sort of funding increase is warranted for our transportation infrastructure.

However, it would surely be nice (and transparent) if the billions of dollars paid by the motoring public via the gas tax were spent only on highways and related infrastructure. Funding for transit should be collected from its users, not the motoring public ("The toll on U.S. roads," May 13).

Users of transit pay only a small fraction of its construction and operating costs. Fares cover only a small fraction of transit costs. The majority and remainder comes from gasoline tax revenues and other general tax revenues as a huge subsidy. Common-sense budgeting just may help Congress restore to itself some sense of credibility.

Lori Watchinsky

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • What's the cost of lower tolls?

    What's the cost of lower tolls?

    It is my understanding that Maryland's transportation infrastructure is in serious need of maintenance. If that is the case, what could possibly be the point of reducing the tolls on our highways, other than to make political capital ("Panel expected to OK toll reductions," May 7)?

  • Gas tax is wasted

    Gas tax is wasted

    In your editorial, "Congress on the clock" (April 13), you talk about the federal Highway Trust Fund going bankrupt unless Congress acts to raise taxes. Motorists deserve better highways and bridge repair, but the truth is not all of the tax money motorists pay goes to build or repair roads or...

Comments
Loading
68°