Get unlimited digital access to $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Gansler is way off base about tablet computers for prison inmates

Maryland Attorney General Doug Gansler's proposal to supply state prisoners with tablet computers exemplifies just how out of touch he is with the average Marylander ("Gansler proposes tablet computers for inmates," Aug. 5).

Mr. Gansler must believe that it is OK to recklessly spend our tax dollars on ill-advised projects such as this one. It is time for us to let Mr. Gansler and other elected officials know that we will not sit idly by and watch them squander away our money.

Many hardworking Maryland citizens do not have the luxury of owning tablet computers. There are residents who work paycheck to paycheck, sometimes running out of cash before their next payday. Instead of spending money on a tablet for entertainment, these individuals are struggling to feed and clothe their children in these turbulent economic times. Why should the tax dollars of hardworking Marylanders be used to reward people who willfully broke the law?

I do not mean to sound callous — I am all for second chances and I believe that people, even prisoners, can change. Upon their release, inmates are certainly free to re-enter society, save up some money and buy any tablet, gadget or computer their hearts desire. But I object to handing out fancy gadgets to people who are supposed to be paying their debt to society.

Call me old-fashioned, but since when do prisons exist to provide high-end electronics to inmates? In a time when families are making sacrifices to stay out of poverty, how dare Mr. Gansler propose an idea as preposterous as tablet computers for inmates. Does he not realize that taxpayers are already paying more than enough every year to provide room and board for these lawbreakers?

Gregory Prush, Pikesville

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Pot is no harmless drug

    In response to the recent letter from Stan White of Dillon, Colo. ("Fight heroin by legalizing pot," March 3), I would point out that the disease of addiction is not drug-specific. I do agree with him that people who buy weed "on the streets" have a better than average opportunity to find...

  • The lessons of Ferguson

    The Justice Department on Wednesday released a devastating critique of police and city officials in Ferguson, Mo., where an unarmed black teenager was fatally shot by an officer last year. Though the department did not find cause to bring a civil rights indictment against the officer who killed...

  • White House obfuscates on Clinton emails

    The article "West Wing and Democrats not on same page regarding Clinton's emails" (March 4) shows something is amiss within the Democratic Party. The story says the "…top White House spokesman said he wasn't sure whether anyone in the West Wing suspected [former Secretary of State...

  • Was Netanyahu playing bad cop?

    Does anyone else think that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's speech may have actually strengthened the U.S. negotiating position? ("Netanyahu's pointless speech," March 4.) Juxtaposing a far more aggressive alternative against the offering? Mr. Netanyahu may have done our...

  • Who do the Democrats think they're fooling?
    Who do the Democrats think they're fooling?

    I am disappointed but not surprised by the furor over whether to fully fund the Department of Homeland Security ("Congress OKs deal to avoid shutdown at Homeland Security," Feb. 27).

  • The stigma of suicide for those nearing the end of life

    If the proposed physician assisted suicide legislation were referred to instead as "physician assisted end of life," perhaps the stigma attached would be more palatable ("Dying former official a focus of Maryland assisted suicide bill," Feb. 14).