Save 75% - Only $49.99 for 1 full year! digitalPLUS subscription offer ends 12/1
NewsOpinionReaders Respond

Gansler not believable on taxes

ElectionsExecutive BranchPersonal Weapon ControlInterior PolicyDouglas F. GanslerGun Control

I love it when politicians who have been in power for some time all of a sudden have a change of heart. Maryland Attorney General Doug Gansler now says that he is a different Democrat from all of the others and that it is time to cut taxes ("Candidates for governor pledge tax cuts for business," Oct. 4).

Although I agree wholeheartedly with his words, especially regarding the various taxes on gasoline, cell phones, water, air and health or whatever else has come or will be coming to Maryland, I highly suspect his actions. As a matter of fact, I just think he is outright lying. He has supported or help write half of the laws to tax us right now especially the gun laws that are under litigation.

A tiger cannot change his stripes. The Democrats in this state have not met a tax yet that they are not in favor of in over 40 years. The Democrats have never gotten rid of taxes and actually push the limit on unconstitutional bills that absolutely soak the citizenship of this state. This is why you are seeing the loss of our Fortune 500 companies, losing our high-income earners and the population in general.

Nice try, Mr. Gansler, but let's not start off your race for governor with an outright lie. Tell the people the truth — that there has not been a tax you have not loved. We have your track record. What are we, a stupid people?

Joe Collins Jr., Baltimore

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
ElectionsExecutive BranchPersonal Weapon ControlInterior PolicyDouglas F. GanslerGun Control
  • Polls are not in public interest
    Polls are not in public interest

    Mileah Kromer discusses the reasons that the results of pre-election polls concerning the race for governor were largely incorrect, particularly the timing of the polls on which media and the campaigns relied ("Hogan and Brown: tortoise and hare?" Nov. 12). I do not doubt that she is largely...

  • Purple Maryland
    Purple Maryland

    It's safe to say the election is over, and we are all anxious to see what "color" our state will be. Are we now red with a base of blue or still blue with a splash of red ("Republican sees spending as key for governor-elect," Nov. 14)?

  • Race played no role in Hogan win
    Race played no role in Hogan win

    I read Thomas Schaller's column ("Race had a role in Hogan's win," Nov. 11) regarding Larry Hogan's win over Lt. Gov. Anthony Brown in the 2014 Maryland gubernatorial election. He basically states that the areas Mr. Hogan won had more white people then black.

  • Reader to The Sun: Hogan won, get used to it
    Reader to The Sun: Hogan won, get used to it

    I agree with letter writer David Byran that Governor-elect Larry Hogan has done Maryland and the entire country a great service ("Good riddance to "O'Malley," Oct. 10).

  • Is Hogan inevitable in 2018?
    Is Hogan inevitable in 2018?

    I couldn't decide whether I was more amused or bemused by Richard J. Cross III's op-ed about the possible Democratic candidates for governor four years from now ("Who will challenge Hogan in 2018?" Nov. 15).

  • Enough with the talk of race in analyzing elections
    Enough with the talk of race in analyzing elections

    Race, racism, racist. I am so tired of hearing these words whenever a candidate loses or a policy is defeated ("Race had a role in Hogan's win," Nov. 11). Lt. Gov. Anthony G. Brown lost to Larry Hogan because Mr. Brown ran one of the worst campaigns in recent Maryland elections. He even...

Comments
Loading