Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Fracking requires more scrutiny

Hooray for Del. Heather Mizeur for staring down oil companies over fracking in Maryland ("No studies? No fracking," Sept. 13). Delegate Mizeur is demanding solid, scientific studies of all the risks of fracking before allowing it here. The oil industry maintains that fracking is safe.

But if fracking is safe, why did the oil industry seek, and get, special treatment in the 2005 Energy Bill to keep the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency from regulating fracking? This "Halliburton Loophole" is named after former Vice President and Halliburton oil chief Dick Cheney. He helped get this "special treatment" that is still in force today. And if fracking is safe, why did Nationwide Mutual Insurance announce in July that it will no longer insure policyholders who allow fracking on their land? Nationwide says the risks are "too great to ignore."

And if fracking is safe, why did Ohio lawmakers halt underground injection of fracking waste water after more than a dozen earthquakes rocked Ohio this January? Oh, wait — the oil companies say that waste water disposal is not "fracking." Still, deep injection is a standard way to dispose of the toxic water and chemical mix that returns to the surface from fracked wells. It's so nasty that water treatment plants can't clean it up enough to put it back into our water systems.

So until solid scientific studies show that fracking can be done safely, we should just say "no." Because once you let the genie out of the bottle, it's hard to get him back in again. Call your legislators and say, "No studies, no fracking."

Nancy Koran, Bethesda

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • The frackers are coming, the frackers are coming!
    The frackers are coming, the frackers are coming!

    History, myth, and legend informs those of us in the United States that on a chilly night in 1775 a relative of mine mounted his horse, and as loudly as he could, rode through the streets of Boston proclaiming that an invading fleet was entering the harbor aiming to muzzle and arrest any acts...

  • Thank God Hogan wasn't in charge of the fracking report
    Thank God Hogan wasn't in charge of the fracking report

    Maryland's recent report on fracking safely is an example of smart governing ("O'Malley administration sets out path to fracking in Md.," Nov. 25). In July 2011, Gov. Martin O'Malley ordered a commission to be formed by the Maryland Department of the Environment and the Department of Natural...

  • There is no safe fracking, Mr. O'Malley
    There is no safe fracking, Mr. O'Malley

    Gov. Martin O'Malley's announcement that the state will move forward with establishing regulations for hydraulic fracturing — fracking — in Maryland leaves behind a terrible legacy. He has secured his place in history as the one who opened up the state to the inherent risks of the...

  • A frackless future for Maryland
    A frackless future for Maryland

    Jim Guy's "No fracking in Western Md." (Oct. 10) and Robert Lawrence's "Time to ban fracking, O'Malley" (Oct. 10) make an indisputable case for keeping fracking out of Maryland.

  • Fracking's risks are manageable, so what's the holdup?
    Fracking's risks are manageable, so what's the holdup?

    Your recent editorial argued that "the longer we wait before embracing fracking, the better informed we will be" ("Fracking still worrisome," Oct. 7).

  • O'Malley should ban fracking
    O'Malley should ban fracking

    Based on Robert Lawrence's commentary, "Ban fracking, O'Malley" (Oct. 10), we have to be ever grateful that Gov. Martin O'Malley and the legislature decided to "look before they leap" by requiring a health study before authorizing hydraulic fracturing to drill for natural gas in Maryland. Now...

Comments
Loading