Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

Gas companies need to come clean about fracking health risks

While the Pennsylvania law cited in your article "Doctors question fracking law" (April 20) "compels natural gas firms to turn over information about chemicals they use ... to health care professionals who ask," there seems nothing in it that would stop gas companies from turning over this vital information voluntarily, and not demanding the professionals sign confidentiality agreements, as compelled disclosure does.

The requirement that health care researchers not disclose their findings is ridiculous, given that open reporting is a basic requirement of scientific research, and sharing health information is fundamental to any hope of public health.

What company profits would be so great as to demand that neighborhoods of children and adults suffer negative medical consequences so as not to interfere with the owners' enrichment? While we don't know that such damage has occurred, we certainly must find out because of the existing evidence that hints of it. If there is another cause of the skin cancers found, we should learn what it is.

Must we go continually bow to manufacturers who use risky procedures or make risky products, as we did for years with cigarette companies (among others) before we finally get honest answers to what is going on?

Nancy M. Henley, Cockeysville

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • The frackers are coming, the frackers are coming!
    The frackers are coming, the frackers are coming!

    History, myth, and legend informs those of us in the United States that on a chilly night in 1775 a relative of mine mounted his horse, and as loudly as he could, rode through the streets of Boston proclaiming that an invading fleet was entering the harbor aiming to muzzle and arrest any acts...

  • Thank God Hogan wasn't in charge of the fracking report
    Thank God Hogan wasn't in charge of the fracking report

    Maryland's recent report on fracking safely is an example of smart governing ("O'Malley administration sets out path to fracking in Md.," Nov. 25). In July 2011, Gov. Martin O'Malley ordered a commission to be formed by the Maryland Department of the Environment and the Department of Natural...

  • There is no safe fracking, Mr. O'Malley
    There is no safe fracking, Mr. O'Malley

    Gov. Martin O'Malley's announcement that the state will move forward with establishing regulations for hydraulic fracturing — fracking — in Maryland leaves behind a terrible legacy. He has secured his place in history as the one who opened up the state to the inherent risks of the...

  • A frackless future for Maryland
    A frackless future for Maryland

    Jim Guy's "No fracking in Western Md." (Oct. 10) and Robert Lawrence's "Time to ban fracking, O'Malley" (Oct. 10) make an indisputable case for keeping fracking out of Maryland.

  • Fracking's risks are manageable, so what's the holdup?
    Fracking's risks are manageable, so what's the holdup?

    Your recent editorial argued that "the longer we wait before embracing fracking, the better informed we will be" ("Fracking still worrisome," Oct. 7).

  • O'Malley should ban fracking
    O'Malley should ban fracking

    Based on Robert Lawrence's commentary, "Ban fracking, O'Malley" (Oct. 10), we have to be ever grateful that Gov. Martin O'Malley and the legislature decided to "look before they leap" by requiring a health study before authorizing hydraulic fracturing to drill for natural gas in Maryland. Now...