Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Fracking should frighten us, despite the industry platitudes that paper over its dangers

Commentator Bishop Harry R. Jackson Jr.'s arguments in favor of shale oil drilling are deeply flawed ("Fracking: Don't let fear hold us back," Oct. 12). After a summer of record flooding, we are entitled to a healthy fear of what gets flushed from old wells, industrial sites and waste water holding pits.

More to the point, hydraulic fracturing to extract shale oil and gas is a frightening health threat. Dr. Walter Tsou, past president of the American Public Health Association, told the Philadelphia City Council that "politicians have explicitly avoided the public health question because if they were really confronted with it, they would stop hydraulic fracturing."

The half of 1 percent of fracking fluids that Bishop Jackson claims are "weak salts" and other minerals include carcinogens that are known to be potent even at very low concentrations. Meanwhile, state environmental protection agencies have dwindling resources to document the health threats associated with all aspects of shale gas extraction and to protect our drinking water.

The Bipartisan Policy Center, in a July 2010 memo, reported that "hydraulic fracturing is specifically exempted from regulation by the [federal] Environmental Protection Agency under the Safe Water Drinking Act. "

It is not "fear tactics" for consumer advocates to ask government for assurances of safe drinking water.

Studies of the economic impact of shale gas drilling indicate there are huge costs as well as benefits. The energy industry has deep pockets to tout the benefits, while public interest advocates and local governments must struggle with shrinking budgets to document the environmental and health costs, which include spills, damage to roads and contaminated drinking wells and ground water.

Shale gas is not a clean energy source. It results in the discharge of methane gas, a more powerful greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. Investments in shale gas drilling infrastructure divert us from investing in truly green energy technologies such as solar and wind.

Fracking does frighten me. I'm hoping a lot more citizens will develop a healthy fear of the industry with its platitudes and self-serving research and insist on holding back shale gas extraction in Maryland.

Rebecca Ruggles, Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Western Md. faces fracking threat
    Western Md. faces fracking threat

    The recent article about fracking in Western Maryland seemed to me to raise more arguments for not drilling for natural gas in Garrett County than for it ("Fracking debate intensifies in Western Maryland, those benefits would be relatively short-term since "Western Maryland's gas reserves are limited."

  • Risks of fracking are unacceptable
    Risks of fracking are unacceptable

    I am a resident and property owner in Garrett County and want my voice heard by state officials: I do not want fracking in Maryland.

  • Fracking an assault on the planet
    Fracking an assault on the planet

    The Baltimore Sun recently carried a letter from a reader advocating fracking in Maryland, apparently placing the priority on overpopulating the planet and "to hell with the environment" ("Md. shouldn't make the same mistake as New York in banning fracking," March 31). Already, fracking has been...

  • Fracking causes no harm
    Fracking causes no harm

    With the House of Delegates recently voting to institute a three-year moratorium on hydraulic fracturing, it's clear that politics could trump science in Maryland ("Md. shouldn't make the same mistake as New York in banning fracking," March 31).

  • Md. shouldn't make the same mistake as New York in banning fracking
    Md. shouldn't make the same mistake as New York in banning fracking

    I live in Deposit in New York's Southern Tier and know first-hand how New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo's decision to ban fracking has taken away our chance to transform our economically depressed communities into thriving ones ("New York bans fracking, citing health risks," Dec. 18).

  • Fracking's risks are 'considerable'
    Fracking's risks are 'considerable'

    I applaud your March 23 editorial endorsing a moratorium on fracking in Western Maryland ("Fracking deserves a pause," March 25). My considerable research reveals fracking in Maryland imposes severe and permanent environmental risks with questionable to negative long-term economic impacts to produce...

  • Fracking moratorium is the right step
    Fracking moratorium is the right step

    Your editorial ("Fracking deserves a pause," March 25) got it right on all counts. Fracking simply does not mesh well with our tourist industry in Western Maryland.

  • Fracking not worth the risks
    Fracking not worth the risks

    I applaud The Baltimore Sun for its position in favor of a moratorium on fracking in Maryland ("Fracking deserves a pause," March 25). We are learning more every day of the irreparable damage being done to the environment and health of people living where hydraulic fracturing is taking place. And,...

Comments
Loading

52°