Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Proposed fracking study reveals delegate's anti-business attitude

Del. Heather Mizeur writes that she plans to introduce legislation in January to ban fracking in Maryland until the oil and gas industry agrees to fund a study of the "potential threats" of the process ("No studies? No fracking," Sept. 13).

Ms. Mizeur raises several arguments about the alleged harm of fracking, yet one wonders what study would determine whether it is safe. Her statement that the reason for her bill is that the commission studying the matter "does not have dedicated resources to fund this issue" is laughable, since the legislature could have created funding for the study but chose not to so.

Ms. Mizeur can't seem to understand that the industry has legitimate grounds to be wary of paying a "fee" to fund a study that will be based more on politics than on science. Our country is sitting on an ocean of natural gas and shale oil. This resource can provide hundreds of thousands of jobs to our citizens, provide inexpensive and clean energy for generations and help obtain long desired energy independence.

Presumably, Ms. Mizeur would prefer that we continue to obtain our oil from tyrants in the Middle East and Venezuela and also depend on windmills. Let's hope for a lot of windy days.

Instead of polishing her apple before liberal environmental groups and making sure that MSNBC spells her name correctly, perhaps Ms. Mizeur should devote her energy to working with the oil and gas industry to develop safe and proper procedures for fracking, thereby helping the environment and harvesting a crucial resource.

That, however, will not happen, since Ms. Mizeur does not want fracking either now or in the future. Many states, such as North Dakota, are booming because of their oil and gas industry. Maryland lags behind because of our well-deserved anti-business reputation, led by politicians such as Ms. Mizeur.

Robert C. Erlandson, Lutherville

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Western Md. faces fracking threat

    Western Md. faces fracking threat

    The recent article about fracking in Western Maryland seemed to me to raise more arguments for not drilling for natural gas in Garrett County than for it ("Fracking debate intensifies in Western Maryland, those benefits would be relatively short-term since "Western Maryland's gas reserves are limited."

  • Fracking's false promise

    Fracking's false promise

    Letter writer Matthew Dempsey wants us all to jump on the fracking bandwagon, quoting governors of both parties, including former Gov. Martin O'Malley, that "regulations will effectively manage the risks of fracking" ("Fracking causes no harm," April 2).

  • Risks of fracking are unacceptable

    Risks of fracking are unacceptable

    I am a resident and property owner in Garrett County and want my voice heard by state officials: I do not want fracking in Maryland.

  • Fracking an assault on the planet

    Fracking an assault on the planet

    The Baltimore Sun recently carried a letter from a reader advocating fracking in Maryland, apparently placing the priority on overpopulating the planet and "to hell with the environment" ("Md. shouldn't make the same mistake as New York in banning fracking," March 31). Already, fracking has been...

  • Fracking causes no harm

    Fracking causes no harm

    With the House of Delegates recently voting to institute a three-year moratorium on hydraulic fracturing, it's clear that politics could trump science in Maryland ("Md. shouldn't make the same mistake as New York in banning fracking," March 31).

  • Md. shouldn't make the same mistake as New York in banning fracking

    Md. shouldn't make the same mistake as New York in banning fracking

    I live in Deposit in New York's Southern Tier and know first-hand how New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo's decision to ban fracking has taken away our chance to transform our economically depressed communities into thriving ones ("New York bans fracking, citing health risks," Dec. 18).

  • Fracking's risks are 'considerable'

    Fracking's risks are 'considerable'

    I applaud your March 23 editorial endorsing a moratorium on fracking in Western Maryland ("Fracking deserves a pause," March 25). My considerable research reveals fracking in Maryland imposes severe and permanent environmental risks with questionable to negative long-term economic impacts to produce...

  • Fracking moratorium is the right step

    Fracking moratorium is the right step

    Your editorial ("Fracking deserves a pause," March 25) got it right on all counts. Fracking simply does not mesh well with our tourist industry in Western Maryland.

Comments
Loading
75°