Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99
News Opinion Readers Respond

Hazards of fracking deserve closer look

In an article about natural gas drilling ("Md. environment chief wants more U.S. oversight of fracking," April 13), The Sun's John Fritze reports that to "extract natural gas through fracking, companies use millions of gallons of liquids," but that explanation is inadequate. Anyone interested in information about fracking for gas extraction should watch the HBO documentary, "Gasland," or drive up to Bradford County, Penn. and see the devastating results of this process.

Toxic chemicals are pumped into the ground with water and sand to force the gas up. Sixty-five of the chemicals used are considered dangerous to human health. Water buffalos sit on properties where the wells have been contaminated with methane and other toxic substances. Some homes must be "vented out" when the methane inside becomes dangerously high. Property values of homes with contaminated wells have plummeted in Bradford County. Tanker trucks carrying water to the gas extraction sites and removing the contaminated water for disposal travel 24/7 through the area.

Contaminated well water is not safe to drink and is too polluted for bathing, cooking, laundry, etc. Home owners are responsible for the cost of testing well water. These tests are not the standard tests and costs between $500 and $1,000. The gas company supplies water to the residents with contaminated wells, but will not claim responsibility for the contamination. Methane has been observed bubbling in the Susquehanna River around Sugar Run, which eventually empties into the Chesapeake Bay.

The Halliburton Loophole, part of the Bush Administration's 2005 Energy Bill, stripped the EPA of its authority to enforce the Clean Water Act by exempting the energy companies. Besides restoring authority to the EPA, it's time to invest in clean energy.

Janet Stringer, Havre de Grace

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Md. should ban fracking
    Md. should ban fracking

    Thank you for bringing attention to New York's recent ban on fracking ("Fracking ban in NY prompts calls for MD to follow suit," Dec. 17). I applaud Gov. Andrew Cuomo for putting the health of New Yorkers above the pressure for dirty energy. Now it's time for Maryland to do the same.

  • Fracking's risks are 'considerable'
    Fracking's risks are 'considerable'

    I applaud your March 23 editorial endorsing a moratorium on fracking in Western Maryland ("Fracking deserves a pause," March 25). My considerable research reveals fracking in Maryland imposes severe and permanent environmental risks with questionable to negative long-term economic impacts to...

  • Fracking moratorium is the right step
    Fracking moratorium is the right step

    Your editorial ("Fracking deserves a pause," March 25) got it right on all counts. Fracking simply does not mesh well with our tourist industry in Western Maryland.

  • Fracking not worth the risks
    Fracking not worth the risks

    I applaud The Baltimore Sun for its position in favor of a moratorium on fracking in Maryland ("Fracking deserves a pause," March 25). We are learning more every day of the irreparable damage being done to the environment and health of people living where hydraulic fracturing is taking place....

  • Fracking deserves a pause
    Fracking deserves a pause

    The Maryland House of Delegates gave final approval Tuesday to legislation that would place a moratorium on the use of hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking," to produce natural gas in this state for the next three years. The vote was 93-to-45, a two-thirds majority. The proposal offers the kind...

  • Stop fracking in Md. before your water starts tasting like licorice
    Stop fracking in Md. before your water starts tasting like licorice

    Maryland residents must support the moratorium on fracking and the "gold standard regulations" ("Health, environmental groups seek fracking moratorium," Feb. 5).

  • Why ruin Garrett County?
    Why ruin Garrett County?

    As a retired couple, one of many living in Garrett County, my wife and I find the possibility of fracking wells and all that comes with them completely distressing ("The risks of fracking outweigh the potential benefits," March 3). Having come from a metropolitan area industrialized to the...

  • Fracking poses problems for Western Md.
    Fracking poses problems for Western Md.

    Last week, a Garrett County resident testified in Annapolis that Maryland should proceed with fracking, the dangerous industrial practice recently banned in New York. He claimed that Western Maryland needs the jobs. I ask, what jobs?

Comments
Loading