Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Fracking hasn't caused a spike in earthquakes

I agree with many of Mike Tidwell's suggestions about extreme weather ("Going to Extremes: Intense energy extraction is fueling climate change-linked bizarre weather events," July 6). More and more evidence indicates that the earth's climate is changing, and most of us scientists think that we humans are the major cause.

I am concerned, though, with the way Mr. Tidwell meandered off-message into a critique of hydraulic fracturing. He asserts that burning natural gas is only marginally better than burning coal. This may be, but coal releases more CO2, and it also produces other pollutants. But his linking of fracking with "an astonishing rise in earthquakes all across the mid-section of America" is extreme.

According to a June 15 U.S. National Research Council report, fracking itself does not pose a high risk for felt seismic events. An article from the American Geophysical Union reports that while 35,000 shale gas wells have been fracked in the U.S., only one case of felt seismicity is even suspected. Globally, there was one confirmed case — a small magnitude-2.3 quake — in the U.K. in 2011. Thus, in regions of low historically felt seismicity (including Mountain Maryland) the NRC report suggests that fracking poses little seismic risk.

Slightly more risky, though, is deep injection of used fracking fluids and other wastewater. Few people realize that there are over 150,000 wastewater injection wells in the U.S. (but none in Maryland). Earthquakes have been linked to wastewater injection, especially in areas of known historical seismicity. Other more troublesome risks of wastewater injection include the possibility of surface spills and well failures, so this practice clearly needs to be monitored and regulated with utmost attention.

David A. Vanko, Towson

The writer is a geologist and dean of the Jess and Mildred Fisher College of Science and Mathematics at Towson University.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Western Md. faces fracking threat

    Western Md. faces fracking threat

    The recent article about fracking in Western Maryland seemed to me to raise more arguments for not drilling for natural gas in Garrett County than for it ("Fracking debate intensifies in Western Maryland, those benefits would be relatively short-term since "Western Maryland's gas reserves are limited."

  • Fracking's false promise

    Fracking's false promise

    Letter writer Matthew Dempsey wants us all to jump on the fracking bandwagon, quoting governors of both parties, including former Gov. Martin O'Malley, that "regulations will effectively manage the risks of fracking" ("Fracking causes no harm," April 2).

  • Risks of fracking are unacceptable

    Risks of fracking are unacceptable

    I am a resident and property owner in Garrett County and want my voice heard by state officials: I do not want fracking in Maryland.

  • Fracking an assault on the planet

    Fracking an assault on the planet

    The Baltimore Sun recently carried a letter from a reader advocating fracking in Maryland, apparently placing the priority on overpopulating the planet and "to hell with the environment" ("Md. shouldn't make the same mistake as New York in banning fracking," March 31). Already, fracking has been...

  • Fracking causes no harm

    Fracking causes no harm

    With the House of Delegates recently voting to institute a three-year moratorium on hydraulic fracturing, it's clear that politics could trump science in Maryland ("Md. shouldn't make the same mistake as New York in banning fracking," March 31).

  • Md. shouldn't make the same mistake as New York in banning fracking

    Md. shouldn't make the same mistake as New York in banning fracking

    I live in Deposit in New York's Southern Tier and know first-hand how New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo's decision to ban fracking has taken away our chance to transform our economically depressed communities into thriving ones ("New York bans fracking, citing health risks," Dec. 18).

  • Fracking's risks are 'considerable'

    Fracking's risks are 'considerable'

    I applaud your March 23 editorial endorsing a moratorium on fracking in Western Maryland ("Fracking deserves a pause," March 25). My considerable research reveals fracking in Maryland imposes severe and permanent environmental risks with questionable to negative long-term economic impacts to produce...

  • Fracking moratorium is the right step

    Fracking moratorium is the right step

    Your editorial ("Fracking deserves a pause," March 25) got it right on all counts. Fracking simply does not mesh well with our tourist industry in Western Maryland.

Comments
Loading
77°