Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Ethanol remains a sensible alternative to oil

Karen Hosler's recent opinion piece calling for an end to ethanol subsidies ("End the ethanol charade," Aug. 30) uses sweeping generalizations that distort the truth about grain ethanol's role in fostering America's energy independence and producing food as well as fuel.

Domestic ethanol is the single-best alternative to foreign oil we have today. In 2010, ethanol reduced imports by 445 million barrels of oil — more oil than we import from Saudi Arabia. And America's ethanol industry helped reduce farm subsidy payments by $10.1 billion, added $53.6 billion to the economy and reduced gas prices by $34.5 billion.

Life cycle analysis studies prove grain ethanol is at least 59 percent cleaner than conventional gasoline. And, domestic ethanol creates U.S. jobs by keeping American money in the American economy, instead of shipping it overseas.

If Ms. Hosler wants to know what's driving up food prices today, I would urge her to look to oil. Corn is a fraction of the cost of groceries on the shelf — three cents for every dollar. Meanwhile, the cost of oil is associated with all the costs of processing, packaging and transporting groceries.

And what many don't know is that the production of ethanol creates both fuel and food. As much as a third of the corn used for ethanol returns to the feed supply as distillers grains, a nutritious, affordable animal feed.

Unlike the oil industry, which continues to cling to its permanent tax credits, the ethanol industry has already volunteered to give up their tax credit in exchange for a level playing field. In an open market, ethanol can compete without government assistance.

Bottom-line, ethanol is not a "magic elixir," like so many other alternatives that are being pursued. Grain ethanol is here today displacing foreign oil, creating jobs and lowering harmful emissions.

Stephanie Dreyer,Washington, D.C.

The writer is a senior public affairs associate with Growth Energy which represents the producers and supporters of ethanol.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Ethanol makes no sense

    Sen. Ben Cardin and Karen Hostler are right in saying we do not need ethanol as a gasoline additive, while Stephanie Dreyer is a spin artist in her response to their comments ("Ethanol makes sense," Sept. 1). While not entirely inaccurate, the omissions in her arguments are significant.

  • Summer break was too short

    Summer break was too short

    When Baltimore County students went back to school more than two weeks before Labor Day this fall, everyone talked about how short the summer seemed. That's because it was shorter this year — a total of only nine weeks.

  • Green energy won't create jobs

    Green energy won't create jobs

    Letter writer Shilpa Shenvi recently claimed the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Act should be renewed because it will add $1.6 billion to the state's economy and generate 37,000 jobs ("Green energy = jobs," Aug. 22).

  • Trump the demagogue

    Trump the demagogue

    I was extremely pleased to read Armin Mruck's letter regarding Donald Trump ("Triumph of the Trump," Aug. 27).

  • Towson U's leading man

    Towson U's leading man

    The recent Sun photo spread of Towson University's most famous celebrities left out one of its most famous graduates.

  • A gift for friendship

    A gift for friendship

    Fred Rasmussen's fine obituary of Peter W. Culman highlighted Peter's outstanding career in the theater ("Peter W. Culman, former Center Stage managing director, dies," Aug. 24).

  • Immigration and the English language

    Immigration and the English language

    Regarding your recent editorial on immigration, how can anyone trust the ultra-liberal ACLU and the American Immigration Council to provide unbiased, factual information ("A misguided view of immigrants," Aug. 18)?

  • Lead paint victims need protection

    Lead paint victims need protection

    Children who have been poisoned by lead paint in unsafe housing should not be harmed again by unfair settlement agreements stripping them of the monetary benefit awarded them by a judge or jury ("Protecting Baltimore's lead paint victims," Aug. 28).