Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99
News Opinion Readers Respond

Ethanol makes no sense

Sen. Ben Cardin and Karen Hostler are right in saying we do not need ethanol as a gasoline additive, while Stephanie Dreyer is a spin artist in her response to their comments ("Ethanol makes sense," Sept. 1). While not entirely inaccurate, the omissions in her arguments are significant.

For example, Ms. Dreyer expertly avoids mentioning that ethanol is produced by burning carbon fuels and that studies have shown only marginal energy savings in ethanol use over gasoline. Ethanol also results in lower gas mileage compared to traditional gasoline.

By treating the increased cost of corn and the higher cost of feed grain as insignificant, Ms. Dreyer appears oblivious of the true cost of ethanol as a fuel.

Malcolm McKnight, Cambridge

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • End the ethanol charade
    End the ethanol charade

    Karen Hosler writes that the great environmental hope has been exposed as a hoax; conservation is a better bet than magic elixirs

  • Ethanol remains a sensible alternative to oil

    Karen Hosler's recent opinion piece calling for an end to ethanol subsidies ("End the ethanol charade," Aug. 30) uses sweeping generalizations that distort the truth about grain ethanol's role in fostering America's energy independence and producing food as well as fuel.

Comments
Loading