Save 75% - Only $49.99 for 1 full year! digitalPLUS subscription offer ends 12/1
NewsOpinionReaders Respond

Ethanol makes no sense

EthanolRenewable EnergyBiofuelsEnergy SavingBenjamin L. Cardin

Sen. Ben Cardin and Karen Hostler are right in saying we do not need ethanol as a gasoline additive, while Stephanie Dreyer is a spin artist in her response to their comments ("Ethanol makes sense," Sept. 1). While not entirely inaccurate, the omissions in her arguments are significant.

For example, Ms. Dreyer expertly avoids mentioning that ethanol is produced by burning carbon fuels and that studies have shown only marginal energy savings in ethanol use over gasoline. Ethanol also results in lower gas mileage compared to traditional gasoline.

By treating the increased cost of corn and the higher cost of feed grain as insignificant, Ms. Dreyer appears oblivious of the true cost of ethanol as a fuel.

Malcolm McKnight, Cambridge

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
EthanolRenewable EnergyBiofuelsEnergy SavingBenjamin L. Cardin
  • End the ethanol charade
    End the ethanol charade

    Karen Hosler writes that the great environmental hope has been exposed as a hoax; conservation is a better bet than magic elixirs

  • Ethanol remains a sensible alternative to oil

    Karen Hosler's recent opinion piece calling for an end to ethanol subsidies ("End the ethanol charade," Aug. 30) uses sweeping generalizations that distort the truth about grain ethanol's role in fostering America's energy independence and producing food as well as fuel.

  • If criminals don't wanted their cellphones tracked they should stop committing crimes
    If criminals don't wanted their cellphones tracked they should stop committing crimes

    Regarding your recent editorial on the privacy issues raised by police tracking suspects through their cellphone numbers, I would gladly give up some of my personal privacy if law enforcement were allowed to locate and arrest criminals before they do me or my family harm ("The police are...

  • Bag ban casts Baltimore as 'Chump City'
    Bag ban casts Baltimore as 'Chump City'

    Nobody asked columnist Dan Rodricks about banning plastic bags, and nobody asked Baltimore retailers or shoppers either ("Nobody asked me, but City Council needs spine," Nov. 23).

  • Ehrlich's 'cult of anti-Obamaism'
    Ehrlich's 'cult of anti-Obamaism'

    Though I am 1960s retread boomer and unrepentant liberal who usually disagrees commentator Robert L. Ehrlich Jr., I read his column regularly. No surprise that he recently panned Obamacare — again — but what I never hear from Republicans is the Plan B, i.e., how we deal with the...

  • Let's just ban the bags
    Let's just ban the bags

    I have a problem with plastic bags and the bag tax issue ("Council passes body camera bill, plastic bag ban, but veto looms," Nov. 17). So much time and energy has been spent on this issue. When we take a step back and look at the bigger picture, there are so many daily issues, each much more...

  • 'Rain tax' not optional
    'Rain tax' not optional

    The recent sub-headline on the editorial regarding the "rain tax" was patently false ("The bogus 'rain tax' repeal," Nov. 23).

  • How can Ehrlich relish suffering of others?
    How can Ehrlich relish suffering of others?

    It saddens me to see the former congressman and governor of Maryland salivating with anticipation at the thought of depriving millions of Americans of decent health insurance by rolling back the Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare is a varsity stinker," Nov. 23).

Comments
Loading