Summer Sale! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Readers Respond
News Opinion Readers Respond

Maryland gains if estate tax falls [Letter]

Although I am not surprised at yet another left-leaning editorial in The Sun, I think you have missed some very important points in your opposition to reducing Maryland's estate tax ("Settling the estate tax," Jan. 17).

The federal government took steps to increase the exemption from $1 million some years ago to $5.25 million in 2013. Maryland "decoupled" and stayed at $1 million so Maryland is way out of step with the IRS and many other states. That puts Maryland at a great disadvantage in the competition to attract new employers, especially layering that on top of the high personal income tax rate. Successful business owners avoid states were they are considered fair targets for high taxes.

More importantly, when Maryland "decoupled," so did huge numbers of successful Marylanders. We simply moved out of state, by last estimate some 10,000 of us. I personally know more than a dozen ex-Marylanders who are now residents of Delaware, North Carolina, South Carolina and Florida (most of us chose Florida because there is no estate tax or income tax.) Successful and affluent people are much more mobile than the poor and middle class. If Maryland had at least been reasonable about this tax, many of us would have stayed and continued to pay income tax and sales tax as well.

Do the math yourselves, but here is one approach. Ten thousand departed residents might each have paid $8,000 state income tax annually which is equal to the $80 million in lost annual revenue caused by realigning the estate tax, plus something more for sales taxes, plus something more from estate tax collections. Add to that your own estimate of what new employers who avoided Maryland might have paid in all those taxes and you start to understand what Maryland is missing. It could easily be well north of $100 million.

Let me also suggest you should question your opinion that "affluent people who are poised to receive hundreds of thousands of dollars in inheritance ... ought to get in line" behind others seeking tax relief. That implies that inheritance belongs to the state of Maryland and family members should be last in line to receive what their elders earned. Those of us with potentially taxable estates do not see it that way. Our first obligation is to our kids and grandkids, and we feel a responsibility to protect their interests from the greedy hands of state bureaucrats. Regretfully, if that means we have to leave Maryland, we do.

Perhaps the origin of all this pressure to increase taxes (and not decrease any of them) is the irresponsible growth in state spending under Gov. Martin O'Malley. The state budget has increased 36 percent under his leadership. Governor O'Malley has his "spin" on this of course, but that is what happened during a period of financial stagnation for the average citizen. Did your own family budget increase that much? Did the state's economy grow that much? Of course not, and that is the underlying problem regarding taxes in Maryland.

Rick Uhlig

To respond to this letter, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Spin v. reality in Md. job numbers [Editorial]

    Spin v. reality in Md. job numbers [Editorial]

    Our view: State labor department has perfected the glass-half-full view of the economy

  • Boosting business the Maryland way

    Boosting business the Maryland way

    When it comes to business in Maryland, the views of Norman R. Augustine should not be taken lightly. A former CEO of Lockheed Martin and Under Secretary of the U.S. Army, he graduated from Princeton magna cum laude, holds 29 honorary degrees and built a distinguished career in aeronautics engineering,...

  • Don't give up on traditional manufacturing

    Don't give up on traditional manufacturing

    Brian Gaines states that he believes that "STEM-based manufacturers represent the same gateway to economic opportunity for many Marylanders" as Bethlehem Steel did to past generations ("Md.'s new manufacturing," Feb. 12). While I would not argue against expanding our "21st century" manufacturing...

  • State incentives play a big role in business decisions

    State incentives play a big role in business decisions

    Reader Jack Kinstlinger ("Maryland's misleading state greeting," Feb. 13) is apparently unaware that every state government and probably every subdivision in our country employs personnel in an economic development office who are indeed empowered to present adjustments to regulations, favorable...

  • Maryland's misleading state greeting

    Maryland's misleading state greeting

    In a recent letter, Anne Arundel County Executive Steve Schuh repeated the oft-quoted Republican talking point that thousands of companies and people are leaving Maryland because of onerous taxes and regulations ("State greeting is more than just words," Feb. 7).

  • Hogan's rhetoric on Md. business doesn't match reality

    Hogan's rhetoric on Md. business doesn't match reality

    I found it peculiar that Brian Gaines led his op-ed piece ("Md.'s new manufacturing," Feb. 12) with a quote from Gov. Larry Hogan implying that Maryland has been hostile to business. From the article and its accompanying photo, we learn that drug and vaccine manufacturing is burgeoning, not only...

  • Not sorry to see Beretta leave [Letter]

    Not sorry to see Beretta leave [Letter]

    So Beretta is moving its gun factory out of Maryland because of a new gun control law ("Beretta to move gun production from Maryland," July 22)? I say hooray!

  • O'Malley may have helped Beretta make up its mind to leave Md. [Letter]

    O'Malley may have helped Beretta make up its mind to leave Md. [Letter]

    It seems there is no love lost between Gov. Martin O'Malley and the munitions manufacturer Beretta, which is relocating its manufacturing operation out of Maryland to Tennessee ("Beretta to move gun production from Maryland," July 22).