Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Md. leads the region in reducing stormwater runoff [Letter]

Under the leadership of the O'Malley-Brown Administration, Maryland has made great strides toward improving the quality of the natural environment, and it continues to lead the region in efforts to reduce polluted stormwater runoff. Recognizing that this runoff is responsible for a significant percentage of the pollution to the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries, Maryland is aggressively addressing this issue along many fronts, including passage of the landmark Stormwater Management Act of 2007, issuance of new municipal stormwater permits that take bold steps toward cleaning up runoff pollution, and tighter limits on sprawl development.

For all those reasons, a recent Sun report on stormwater management was disappointing ("Bay advocates say state lax in monitoring county stormwater controls," Jan. 3).

The article focuses on the status of triennial reviews of county stormwater control programs — even though such reviews are just one of several ways in which the Maryland Department of the Environment interacts with local jurisdictions and monitors progress on this important issue. When the picture is considered in its whole, it is clear that Maryland is fully engaged in local efforts to reduce this pollution source.

The federal Clean Water Act-mandated "MS4" stormwater permits issued to municipalities and counties and the Watershed Implementation Plan required under the Chesapeake Bay TMDL (pollution loading limits) allow MDE to provide close oversight of local stormwater programs by requiring local jurisdictions to submit annual reports describing the size and scope of their stormwater program, funding and staffing, pollution prevention efforts, monitoring and documentation of progress toward meeting water quality goals.

MDE works closely with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to enforce compliance with all permit provisions. As part of this state-federal coordinated effort, EPA has audited all of the MS4 jurisdictions within the last two years and has even issued financial penalties where it has found program deficiencies. As MDE moves forward with the next generation of permits for Baltimore City, Prince George's and Baltimore Counties, regulatory oversight over the counties is being further strengthened with clearer, more stringent permit language.

Since the passage of the Stormwater Management Act of 2007, which established Maryland as a national leader in sustainable development by requiring the use of low-impact approaches for all new development, MDE has worked closely with local counties and municipal government governments to implement this new law.

Although the Sun article suggests that MDE's oversight of local jurisdictions has been lax with respect to the new law, in fact the department has made implementation of the act a high priority. MDE worked with local governments to develop new regulations to implement the act, provided model ordinances to ensure consistent implementation across jurisdictions, updated our stormwater design manual with detailed standards and specifications for low-impact development practices and provided technical guidance for local government and private-sector engineers and developers.

We have devoted extensive resources to providing technical support to local governments that are charged with ensuring that all private development meets the new standards. Last fall, we held a series of very well-attended forums with local county stormwater officials from across the state to assess their experiences in implementing Maryland's new stormwater requirements and provide guidance to improve the programs.

To be sure, continued and consistent oversight of county stormwater programs is a critical element in our ongoing efforts to restore our watersheds. However, triennial reviews are only one tool in the toolbox, and focusing on this single area misses the broader point: We need to shift the discussion away from misguided notions that stormwater utility fees are a tax on the rain, and that the state's only role is that of an enforcer.

We are seeing as a result of this administration's unrelenting focus on building a smarter, greener, growing Maryland tremendous progress on the environmental front that is coming by way of innovation, new partnerships and a new green economy. Each of us has a role to play in our efforts to protect and clean our water. Maryland continues to be committed to continuing to work as hard as possible to protect this valuable resource.

Robert M. Summers

The writer is secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment.

To respond to this letter, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Hogan's 'rain tax' straw man

    Hogan's 'rain tax' straw man

    Webster's defines a "straw man" as "an argument or opponent set up so as to be easily refuted or defeated." We can find no better example than Gov. Larry Hogan's crusade against what he calls Maryland's "rain tax," which led this week to his introduction of legislation to repeal a law that he claims...

  • Rain tax deserves a real repeal

    Rain tax deserves a real repeal

    Boy, talk about a slanted, biased editorial ("Carroll Co. talks sense on stormwater," April 2). An issue that, if done truthfully, could have been summed up in a paragraph was turned into a diatribe about how misguided the voters are.

  • Rain tax still isn't justified

    Rain tax still isn't justified

    Regarding The Sun's editorial on the stormwater management fee ("Carroll talks sense on stormwater," April 3), let's first explain Gov. Larry Hogan's position in my opinion. He proposed to get rid of the "rain tax," the legislature voted that down and proposed their own biased solution as offered...

  • Carroll Co. talks sense on stormwater

    Carroll Co. talks sense on stormwater

    If there were any doubt that the drive to repeal Maryland's stormwater management fee, AKA "rain tax," is all politics and no substance, it was erased Wednesday when Carroll County, the jurisdiction that has fought hardest against the levy, balked at a bill to repeal it. That's right. Carroll's...

  • Why should I be taxed to subsidize polluters?

    Why should I be taxed to subsidize polluters?

    I have always acted in an environmentally sound way in how I treat rainwater. I have never owned a house where rain water left my property. Why should I be taxed to subsidize polluters ("Miller storm-water fee bill advances in Senate," March 19)?

  • Churches should not have to pay stormwater fees [Letter]

    Churches should not have to pay stormwater fees [Letter]

    In response to your paper's recent article about churches paying stormwater fees, I would point out that churches provide heavily discounted space for community groups and that many house affordable kindergarten and nursery school programs and provide food and shelter for at-risk populations —...

  • Rain tax exemption not worth the effort

    Rain tax exemption not worth the effort

    When we built our house in Anne Arundel County in 2002, we had to install a $10,000 wastewater management system because we were building within 1,000 feet of a body of water. We found this to be unreasonable but we had no appeal. We were certain that we qualified for an exemption now from the...

  • In rush to cut taxes and fees, lawmakers are sacrificing long-term environmental sustainability

    In rush to cut taxes and fees, lawmakers are sacrificing long-term environmental sustainability

    I was disheartened to read that both Republican and Democratic legislators are already making plans to repeal the stormwater management fees designed to pay for projects that mitigate the only source of Chesapeake Bay pollution that is still on the rise ("After Hogan victory, local governments...