Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99
News Opinion Readers Respond

Md. leads the region in reducing stormwater runoff [Letter]

Under the leadership of the O'Malley-Brown Administration, Maryland has made great strides toward improving the quality of the natural environment, and it continues to lead the region in efforts to reduce polluted stormwater runoff. Recognizing that this runoff is responsible for a significant percentage of the pollution to the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries, Maryland is aggressively addressing this issue along many fronts, including passage of the landmark Stormwater Management Act of 2007, issuance of new municipal stormwater permits that take bold steps toward cleaning up runoff pollution, and tighter limits on sprawl development.

For all those reasons, a recent Sun report on stormwater management was disappointing ("Bay advocates say state lax in monitoring county stormwater controls," Jan. 3).

The article focuses on the status of triennial reviews of county stormwater control programs — even though such reviews are just one of several ways in which the Maryland Department of the Environment interacts with local jurisdictions and monitors progress on this important issue. When the picture is considered in its whole, it is clear that Maryland is fully engaged in local efforts to reduce this pollution source.

The federal Clean Water Act-mandated "MS4" stormwater permits issued to municipalities and counties and the Watershed Implementation Plan required under the Chesapeake Bay TMDL (pollution loading limits) allow MDE to provide close oversight of local stormwater programs by requiring local jurisdictions to submit annual reports describing the size and scope of their stormwater program, funding and staffing, pollution prevention efforts, monitoring and documentation of progress toward meeting water quality goals.

MDE works closely with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to enforce compliance with all permit provisions. As part of this state-federal coordinated effort, EPA has audited all of the MS4 jurisdictions within the last two years and has even issued financial penalties where it has found program deficiencies. As MDE moves forward with the next generation of permits for Baltimore City, Prince George's and Baltimore Counties, regulatory oversight over the counties is being further strengthened with clearer, more stringent permit language.

Since the passage of the Stormwater Management Act of 2007, which established Maryland as a national leader in sustainable development by requiring the use of low-impact approaches for all new development, MDE has worked closely with local counties and municipal government governments to implement this new law.

Although the Sun article suggests that MDE's oversight of local jurisdictions has been lax with respect to the new law, in fact the department has made implementation of the act a high priority. MDE worked with local governments to develop new regulations to implement the act, provided model ordinances to ensure consistent implementation across jurisdictions, updated our stormwater design manual with detailed standards and specifications for low-impact development practices and provided technical guidance for local government and private-sector engineers and developers.

We have devoted extensive resources to providing technical support to local governments that are charged with ensuring that all private development meets the new standards. Last fall, we held a series of very well-attended forums with local county stormwater officials from across the state to assess their experiences in implementing Maryland's new stormwater requirements and provide guidance to improve the programs.

To be sure, continued and consistent oversight of county stormwater programs is a critical element in our ongoing efforts to restore our watersheds. However, triennial reviews are only one tool in the toolbox, and focusing on this single area misses the broader point: We need to shift the discussion away from misguided notions that stormwater utility fees are a tax on the rain, and that the state's only role is that of an enforcer.

We are seeing as a result of this administration's unrelenting focus on building a smarter, greener, growing Maryland tremendous progress on the environmental front that is coming by way of innovation, new partnerships and a new green economy. Each of us has a role to play in our efforts to protect and clean our water. Maryland continues to be committed to continuing to work as hard as possible to protect this valuable resource.

Robert M. Summers

The writer is secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment.

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Rain tax: Noble goal, unfair execution
    Rain tax: Noble goal, unfair execution

    Kim Coble of the Chesapeake Bay Foundation laments that Maryland county officials are considering rolling back their stormwater remediation fees. ("'Rain tax¿ is rolling back," Jan. 26.) In 2012 the Maryland General Assembly passed HB 987 requiring nine Maryland counties and Baltimore...

  • Rain tax proponents are missing the larger issue
    Rain tax proponents are missing the larger issue

    In her letter to the editor ("The stormwater fee and the will of the voters," March 12), Katherine W. Rylaarsdam has bought into the protecting-the-environment argument too strongly and is ignoring the larger issue.

  • Rubbed the wrong way by the rain tax
    Rubbed the wrong way by the rain tax

    Commentator Mileah Kromer makes it clear that her polls indicate people are dubious of whether stormwater runoff contributes to pollution in the Chesapeake Bay ("The rub of the 'rain tax,'" March 8).

  • The rain tax is unfair because not all pay it
    The rain tax is unfair because not all pay it

    I'm for the stormwater management fee if it is paid by all ("End 'rain tax' ridicule rap, repeal and replace law," Feb. 28). It is ridiculous to tie it some counties and not all. In the state of current dynamics, just about all contribute to the problems, and just about all will benefit from...

  • We all must assume responsibility for the bay
    We all must assume responsibility for the bay

    I think Dan Rodricks' suggestion for a new flush tax is a promising alternative to the storm water management fee —one that would hold us all personally responsible for the health of the Chesapeake Bay ("End 'rain tax' ridicule rap, repeal and replace law," Feb. 28).

  • The voters wanted the 'rain tax' repeal
    The voters wanted the 'rain tax' repeal

    I cannot believe that The House Environment and Transportation Committee voted 14-7 to kill the bill to repeal the "rain tax" ("House panel kills Hogan's stormwater fee repeal," March 6). This was one of Gov. Larry Hogan's platform issues about reducing taxes that helped get him elected, and...

  • The stormwater fee and the will of the voters
    The stormwater fee and the will of the voters

    The House Environment and Transportation Committee rejected Gov. Larry Hogan's proposed repeal of the stormwater management fee ("House panel kills Hogan's stormwater fee repeal," March 6). Proponents of repeal, predictably enough, are complaining that the voters "spoke" last November.

  • Churches should not have to pay stormwater fees [Letter]
    Churches should not have to pay stormwater fees [Letter]

    In response to your paper's recent article about churches paying stormwater fees, I would point out that churches provide heavily discounted space for community groups and that many house affordable kindergarten and nursery school programs and provide food and shelter for at-risk populations...

Comments
Loading