Get unlimited digital access to baltimoresun.com. $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion Readers Respond

A consensus on what's good for the bay

While frequently lumped together as one homogenous group, environmentalists every now and then come at the same problem from different perspectives and suggest varying solutions. That is the case with the legislation creating the Maryland Agricultural Certainty Program ("Bill would give farmers 10-year reprieve on new regs," March 27).

Too much is being made of the fact that the environmental community has different opinions about this bill. We all take seriously legislation to improve water quality. And for each group this means carefully analyzing and debating the proposal openly and with transparency and respect. Sometimes we will agree on a position and sometimes we will not.

In the case of the agricultural certainty bill, the Chesapeake Bay Foundation believes it will move us forward in reducing pollution from farms sooner. The bill gives farmers who are good stewards of their land a measure of certainty in their businesses going forward.

Under the proposed law, farms will be treated like any other pollution sources. Farmers would also have a window of time during which they would not be required to meet additional regulations.

We have confidence that while the debate on this bill will remain robust, the environmental community will continue its shared commitment to restoring clean water in Maryland's rivers, streams and the Chesapeake Bay.

Alison Prost, Annapolis

The writer is Maryland executive director of the Chesapeake Bay Foundation.

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • Big ships on the Chesapeake Bay follow strict environmental safety rules
      Big ships on the Chesapeake Bay follow strict environmental safety rules

      Please allow me to correct some of the points letter writer Bernard Helinski recently made regarding ships' ballast water polluting the Chesapeake Bay ("Ship ballast a major source of pollution," Jan. 7).

    • Phosphorus rules, finally
      Phosphorus rules, finally

      As we have chided Gov. Martin O'Malley more than once on this page for dragging his feet on regulations intended to reduce the amount of polluting phosphorus pouring into the Chesapeake Bay from farms, it's only fair to herald his decision to move forward with the rules. That he chose to...

    • A farmer's perspective on phosphorous management
      A farmer's perspective on phosphorous management

      From the time I graduated from college and returned to the farm, I have been dealing with government regulations, environmental extremists and animal rights activists.

    • Could O'Malley's cover crop program be increasing animal waste in the bay?
      Could O'Malley's cover crop program be increasing animal waste in the bay?

      Gov. Martin O'Malley's green agenda really is green ("O'Malley rushes to propose new pollution rules," Nov. 14). Green as the goose waste that pours directly into the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries, mostly during the waterfowl season. And, it's primarily fed by Mr. O'Malley's very own cover...

    • O'Malley sticks it to farmers on his way out the door
      O'Malley sticks it to farmers on his way out the door

      On behalf of 36,000 Maryland Farm Bureau families, I have to disagree with your editorial on the issue of the new phosphorus rules ("Phosphorus rules, finally," Nov. 18). Gov. Martin O'Malley did not get it right. In fact, this is effectively just one last tax increase he is trying to force...

    • Denying Conowingo permit won't clean bay
      Denying Conowingo permit won't clean bay

      While I understand the concern about accumulated nutrient buildup in the sediment upstream of the Conowingo Dam posing a hazard to the health of the Chesapeake Bay, as an engineer I do not see what the operation of the dam's power station has anything to do with it ("Maryland can enforce dam...

    • Dam cleanup too costly
      Dam cleanup too costly

      Regarding the recent commentary about the Conowingo Dam ("Maryland can enforce dam cleanup," Nov. 19), Bob Irvin is correct for the most part. However, let's keep in mind that the Conowingo is a man-made obstruction to sediment, leaves and tree logs that Mother Nature really intended to go to...

    • Hogan needs to reverse O'Malley's onerous farm rules
      Hogan needs to reverse O'Malley's onerous farm rules

      In what will be seen as one of soon-to-be ex-Gov. Martin O'Malley's parting shots to the incoming Hogan administration, Mr. O'Malley is pushing through new regulations controlling how farmers fertilize their land ("O'Malley rushes to propose new pollution rules," Nov. 15). Never mind the fact...

    Comments
    Loading