Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99
News Opinion Readers Respond

When are we going to get serious about climate change? [Letter]

In his ardent defense of the natural gas industry, letter writer Robert C. Erlandson worries that "economic progress" — by which he means the Cove Point LNG project — may be stifled by "environmental zealots" ("Study LNG exports but decide soon" April 7).

Clearly Mr. Erlandson is unworried by any long-term negative environmental impact the facility may have.

Yet American and international businesses are spending huge sums of money to buy up vast territories around and above the Arctic circle to exploit the region's oil and mineral deposits when global warming melts enough of the ice cap to permit full-scale operations.

Military and political leaders around the world are also preparing to deal with the many social crises that will occur when populations around the world are confronted with catastrophic food and water shortages, starvation and forced migration into countries that do not want them.

These business, military and political leaders are hard-headed realists, not "environmental zealots." They understand that global warming is real, serious and that its effects will become increasingly severe in the foreseeable future.

The shouldn't be "is it real" but rather "what to do about it?" Continuing to pretend that a few jobs or the price of gasoline in the U.S. is the big issue is not helpful. We and our children have far more dangerous problems ahead. When are we going to get serious about them?

Bradley Alger, Baltimore

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Last gasp for climate change denial?
    Last gasp for climate change denial?

    Editor's note: This editorial has been updated to reflect that Resources for the Future is not a part of Stanford University. The Sun regrets the error. 

  • Protecting Alaskan wilderness
    Protecting Alaskan wilderness

    Based on the reactions of Alaska Republicans, one might think that President Barack Obama had decided to unilaterally ban guns and snowmobiles from the 49th state instead of merely proposing to upgrade the protected status for certain federally-owned land from "national wildlife refuge" to...

  • Md. bucks national trend toward solar energy
    Md. bucks national trend toward solar energy

    As a Baltimore resident I am embarrassed that Maryland hasn't taken more aggressive steps to harvest renewable resources like solar energy.

  • Coping with climate change
    Coping with climate change

    A recent letter to the editor points out that a solution to climate change is available that could be supported by Republicans ("Carbon fee is bipartisan solution to climate change," Jan 22).

  • Obama as environmentalist
    Obama as environmentalist

    I'm glad reporter John Fritze pointed out President Barack Obama's interest in shaping the political agenda during his State of the Union Address ("Obama sounds populist themes in State of the Union," Jan. 20).

  • Carbon fee is bipartisan solution to climate change
    Carbon fee is bipartisan solution to climate change

    Missing from John Fritze's summary of President Barack Obama's State of the Union address ("Obama turns populist in State of the Union speech," Jan. 21) are his comments on the greatest threat to future generations — climate change. I applaud President Obama for bringing up this difficult...

Comments
Loading