Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99

Readers Respond

News Opinion Readers Respond

Banning energy drinks for kids isn't the answer [Letter]

Contrary to Laura MacCleery's claim ("Energy drinks can kill," March 5), I never asserted that the FDA gave energy drinks a "green light." Rather, I noted in my op-ed ("No one cards at Starbucks," Feb. 26) that the agency conducted an investigation in 2012 and found no cause to take action against these products. That doesn't mean the products are 100 percent safe for any individual to consume in any quantity, but that's true for most products.

I didn't mention Anais Fournier because one death reportedly connected to energy drinks doesn't prove that energy drinks are dangerous, and it shouldn't be the basis for legislation. However, documents filed in state court in Riverside, Calif., by Monster's lawyers reveal that no meaningful toxicity screening was conducted on Ms. Fournier and the medical examiner admits to failing to perform a blood test at the hospital, which would have shown any caffeine in her system. It seems the reason "caffeine toxicity" is listed on the death certificate is because the family insisted the drinks aggravated Fournier's pre-existing heart ailment. If energy drinks were a true threat to the 10 percent of the population with heart conditions, wouldn't we expect to see many more deaths considering the rapid increase in their use over the last decade?

The best way to protect children isn't to ban products but to teach them about balanced diets and the dangers certain foods or drinks can pose so they can make healthy choices into adulthood.

Michelle Minton, Washington

The writer is a fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute.

To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Energy drinks a threat to kids [Letter]
    Energy drinks a threat to kids [Letter]

    Proposed legislation restricting the sale of energy drinks in Maryland is necessary because the energy drink industry targets their marketing at teenagers and does not warn consumers of the dangers of energy drinks ("No one cards at Starbucks," Feb. 27). There is growing consensus in the medical...

  • Energy drinks can kill [Letter]
    Energy drinks can kill [Letter]

    Michelle Minton's commentary on Maryland's reasonable bill to stop stores from selling energy drinks to minors is misleading on a key point ("No one cards at Starbucks," Feb. 26).

  • No one cards at Starbucks [Commentary]
    No one cards at Starbucks [Commentary]

    Energy drinks aren't the enemy, as state bills would have you believe

  • Why no talk of Gray's disabilities?
    Why no talk of Gray's disabilities?

    According to what I've read, Freddie Gray was exposed to lead in early childhood. This resulted in neurological damage, developmental impacts and learning disabilities. Yet, I have seen no discussion of how disability issues factored into the tragic events surrounding Freddie Gray's death ("Six...

  • Baltimore's fateful choice
    Baltimore's fateful choice

    The police need to make a calculated decision on how to proceed regarding the unrest in Baltimore, given there are risks associated with whatever path they take ("After charges against officers, Hopkins' students call for continued protests, dialogue on Freddie Gray," May 1).

  • Violence is not the answer
    Violence is not the answer

    I wanted to write to voice my opinion on the events that led to the death of Freddie Gray along with the protests that turned violent in Baltimore. In police custody, Gray incurred a spinal injury that later resulted in his death. Watching the news coverage of the videos, it is not clear who is...

  • Mayor failed to acknowledge mistakes
    Mayor failed to acknowledge mistakes

    As a consequence of the recent Baltimore protests and riots, there has been a lot of discussion about the leadership qualities of Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake ("Who's in charge?" April 28). There is a fatal flaw in this debate. People are equating the quality of her leadership with decision-making....

  • City's leaders are too inexperienced
    City's leaders are too inexperienced

    I am a little taken aback by what is going on in Baltimore City the last few days. I see the problem as lack of leadership. Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake has no experience to deal with a situation of this magnitude ("Who's in charge?" April 28). The mayor wants to run the whole show, and she doesn't...